We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Regulation of media act of 3217
Details
Submitted by[?]: Monarchic National Front
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3218
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding regulation of media content.
Old value:: There are no content regulations; the media may publish anything, even proven falsehoods.
Current: There are laws against the publication of false information; everything else may be published freely.
Proposed: There are laws against the publication of false information; everything else may be published freely.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: Sexually explicit material is allowed, but violent or hard core pornography is banned.
Current: All sexually explicit material is allowed on television.
Proposed: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:36:38, November 24, 2011 CET | From | Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Regulation of media act of 3217 |
Message | We cannot support any of these articles so we will vote no if this bill is taken to voting. We believe that a free media is key to a vibrant and proud democracy such as ours. There are already libel laws in place to prosecute those who are guilty of reckless slander. Let us not go further as to restrict the media. |
Date | 16:45:51, November 24, 2011 CET | From | Monarchic National Front | To | Debating the Regulation of media act of 3217 |
Message | Honestly we do not understand your position LA. We are not intended to propose censorship...on the contrary we want to defend democracy. Yes, false information are too dangerous for democracy. False information could be use to maipulate (even heavily) public opinion....in the past this had generated war!!!! |
Date | 17:49:19, November 24, 2011 CET | From | Gréne Gebéorscipe Sylf Vorona | To | Debating the Regulation of media act of 3217 |
Message | We would rather this be changed to "Local governments decide upon the funding policy."; different areas depend on public transport in different amounts and allowing the Local governments a bigger responsibility releases the burden on the Assembly. So we agree this should be changed but we must vote no purely because this is not the best way of changing it in our opinion. |
Date | 17:49:38, November 24, 2011 CET | From | Gréne Gebéorscipe Sylf Vorona | To | Debating the Regulation of media act of 3217 |
Message | -_- wrong Bill. Ignore that ^^ |
Date | 21:46:25, November 24, 2011 CET | From | Monarchic National Front | To | Debating the Regulation of media act of 3217 |
Message | :) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes |
Total Seats: 214 | |
no |
Total Seats: 275 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 261 |
Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt |