Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 02:14:08
Server time: 17:45:51, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Dx6743 | hexaus18 | HopesFor | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Regulation of media act of 3217

Details

Submitted by[?]: Monarchic National Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3218

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:36:38, November 24, 2011 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Regulation of media act of 3217
MessageWe cannot support any of these articles so we will vote no if this bill is taken to voting. We believe that a free media is key to a vibrant and proud democracy such as ours. There are already libel laws in place to prosecute those who are guilty of reckless slander. Let us not go further as to restrict the media.

Date16:45:51, November 24, 2011 CET
FromMonarchic National Front
ToDebating the Regulation of media act of 3217
MessageHonestly we do not understand your position LA.
We are not intended to propose censorship...on the contrary we want to defend democracy. Yes, false information are too dangerous for democracy. False information could be use to maipulate (even heavily) public opinion....in the past this had generated war!!!!

Date17:49:19, November 24, 2011 CET
FromGréne Gebéorscipe Sylf Vorona
ToDebating the Regulation of media act of 3217
MessageWe would rather this be changed to "Local governments decide upon the funding policy."; different areas depend on public transport in different amounts and allowing the Local governments a bigger responsibility releases the burden on the Assembly. So we agree this should be changed but we must vote no purely because this is not the best way of changing it in our opinion.

Date17:49:38, November 24, 2011 CET
FromGréne Gebéorscipe Sylf Vorona
ToDebating the Regulation of media act of 3217
Message-_- wrong Bill. Ignore that ^^

Date21:46:25, November 24, 2011 CET
FromMonarchic National Front
ToDebating the Regulation of media act of 3217
Message:)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 214

no
 

Total Seats: 275

abstain
 

Total Seats: 261


Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law.

Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61