We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Extradition Reform - Supporting Justice
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Caucus
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3219
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The terms of extradition.
Old value:: The law bars the government from extraditing anyone who is a citizen of the state.
Current: The law bars the government from extraditing anyone who is a citizen of the state.
Proposed: Extradition to nations with capital punishment or with cruel or inhumane treatment of suspects and convicts is not allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:16:15, November 25, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the Extradition Reform - Supporting Justice |
Message | Not allowing extradition stands in the way of justice. Location should not factor into weather a criminal, or alleged criminal is punished or atleast tried in a court of law. But as citizens they deserve to have their rights protected, and that is what barring extradition to nations with capitol punishment or cruel and unusual punishment. I urge all parties to support this common sense reform. |
Date | 02:42:45, November 25, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the Extradition Reform - Supporting Justice |
Message | The PSCP supports. |
Date | 12:14:45, November 25, 2011 CET | From | New Nationalist Alliance | To | Debating the Extradition Reform - Supporting Justice |
Message | The NNA supports capital punishment and therefore is uncomfortable with the provisions barring extradition to nations that have such a system. However we support the principle argued by the ULC that the current system forbidding extradition at all is, fundamentally unjust. Whilst we cannot actively support this proposal due to the capital punishment provisions, we will not oppose it either. The NNA will therefore abstain. |
Date | 21:30:15, November 25, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the Extradition Reform - Supporting Justice |
Message | The reason the capital punishment restriction was put in place was some nation's justice systems cannot be full trusted. To prevent gross injustices I thought it was reasonable to put that in place. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 269 | |||
no | Total Seats: 91 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 65 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "You don't have to explain something you never said." - Calvin Coolidge |