We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Domestic Animal Ownership Act 3218
Details
Submitted by[?]: Forward Hutori Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3219
Description[?]:
| A bill that seeks to cut unnecessary bureaucracy concerning the ownership of domestic animals |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the ownership of domestic animals as pets.
Old value:: People must register domestic animals with the national government.
Current: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding domestic animal ownership.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:49:15, November 26, 2011 CET | From | United Civic Alliance | To | Debating the Domestic Animal Ownership Act 3218 |
| Message | The Right Honorable Maria Köner, Former Prime Minister of Hutori; Mr. Speaker, I must ask the FHP, how exactly this would help Hutori? It would allow for unregulated ownership of possibly dangerous animals, and without the government being able to protect its citizens. |
| Date | 16:39:43, November 27, 2011 CET | From | Forward Hutori Party | To | Debating the Domestic Animal Ownership Act 3218 |
| Message | John Klugg, Forward Hutori leader Mr Speaker, I must say I am surprised that the conservative parties do not agree with this measure, that will cuts costs and removes a level of bureaucracy from the government. People should be free to own animals as they deem fit, do the conservative parties not trust the people of Hutori to choose their own domesticated animals? |
| Date | 16:43:35, November 27, 2011 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Domestic Animal Ownership Act 3218 |
| Message | Rt Hon Mark Owens MP, Hutorian Prime Minister, Mr Speaker, it is simply a register for animals....it is hardly a "level of bureaucracy" as such. People are banned from having wild and dangerous animals as pets and without this law - there is no way to enforce the other. This is just another example of FHP complaining but no solutions - and they wonder why we are trusted to lead this nation? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 391 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted. |
| Random quote: "When the tyrant has disposed of foreign enemies by conquest or treaty, and there is nothing to fear from them, then he is always stirring up some war or other in order that the people may require a leader." - Plato |