We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Proportion Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2032
Description[?]:
| We beleive that although the minority should have a voice... that larger regions should have more of a say then smaller reagions as they host more of the population. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The method used to determine the number of seats each region receives in the national legislature.
Old value:: A pseudo-proportional algorithm that gives considerable advantage to smaller regions.
Current: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Proposed: A proportional algorithm that gives a very small advantage to larger regions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | not recorded | From | Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK) | To | Debating the Proportion Act |
| Message | We wil not throw this into debate just yet... We would like to aquire some support. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK) | To | Debating the Proportion Act |
| Message | change word debate to vote in above post ;) |
| Date | not recorded | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Proportion Act |
| Message | Why? I'm not debating anyway :-). |
| Date | not recorded | From | Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK) | To | Debating the Proportion Act |
| Message | Would the SBP support this? |
| Date | not recorded | From | Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK) | To | Debating the Proportion Act |
| Message | Oh and also... We sent you a private message which you have not responded to... Did you get it? |
| Date | not recorded | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Proportion Act |
| Message | I have 2 total. I replied to the second on the other night. Is there supposed to be a third? |
| Date | not recorded | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Proportion Act |
| Message | And yes the SBP does support this. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK) | To | Debating the Proportion Act |
| Message | Very well... this is thrown into a vote... |
| Date | not recorded | From | Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK) | To | Debating the Proportion Act |
| Message | I guess that you did not receive our third message.... curious. Oh well, we sent you another. : ) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 432 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 143 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "Presidency, n. The greased pig in the field game of American politics." - Ambrose Bierce |