We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sozialistische Einheitspartei Dundorfs
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3224
Description[?]:
To end the police state. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Current: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Proposed: The police may only disperse a crowd if a state of emergency has been declared.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Current: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Proposed: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the organization of police/law enforcement
Old value:: The government competitively subcontracts security management to private security firms.
Current: There is a national police department funded by the national government and there are local police departments, funded by local governments.
Proposed: The operation and funding of the police is left to local governments.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Current: Police officers carry standard firearms.
Proposed: Police officers carry standard firearms.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:35:36, December 07, 2011 CET | From | Liberaldemokratische Partei | To | Debating the Police Act |
Message | You obviously mean ending public security. And Dundorf has never been a police state except under the SED's rule, when individual freedom was opressed, the media was censored and business owners were expropriated. - Heinrich Heyberger, LDP Spokesman for Internal Affairs |
Date | 18:13:44, December 10, 2011 CET | From | Sozialistische Einheitspartei Dundorfs | To | Debating the Police Act |
Message | No, to end a police state you created. We wonder why you stille think to believe that your party is "liberal". Heinz Schmidt Fraktionsvorsitzender |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 340 | |||
no | Total Seats: 119 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 41 |
Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
Random quote: "In Germany they first came for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me--and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Pastor Martin Niemoller |