Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5476
Next month in: 01:28:56
Server time: 14:31:03, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): burgerboys | dannypk19 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn

Details

Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2149

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=118">Rights of the Unborn</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:27:41, November 27, 2005 CET
FromInactive
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
MessageWe oppose. Where is the option for no abortion at all? Also, murder during first trimester is still murder.

Date18:27:59, November 27, 2005 CET
FromInactive
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
MessageWe also have to add it is a ver misleading title.

Date05:05:59, November 28, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
MessageWe'll support the treaty.

Date19:48:28, November 28, 2005 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
MessageWe oppose such a harsh form of "Rights", although we have nothing against the basis, that unborn babies should not be gotten rid of, there are situations where we feel it is a nessesary thing and we should regulate, but not as harshly as this one.

Date21:07:40, November 28, 2005 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
MessageWhat's wrong with it? We already limit abortion to medical emergencies only and that is within the treaty.

Date22:31:38, November 28, 2005 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
MessageWith moderation, theultimate choice should be with the mother. I don't see why before the baby has grown into a human and tasted life it can't be aborted. Obviousley this is a sensitive issue with many so i think that we could all agree on the moderate option of abortion being made legal during the first trimester.

Date00:13:15, November 29, 2005 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
MessageEven though it has been proven that life begins at conception? No one denies that anymore.

Date13:22:12, November 30, 2005 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Messagepremature life begins at contraception. Will the baby really miss sitting in its mothers womb for a year and a half. Also murdering in the first trimester isn't murder as the baby yet has 2 develop into a human form. Murder by my definition (homicide) is taking away the life of living being that had specifically chosen 2 live. The baby isn't yet a being during the first trimester and therefore, obviously, can't make that specific choice. Furthermore it hasn't been alive and thus has no life 2 be taken away.

Date14:06:53, November 30, 2005 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
MessageA year and a half? A human baby is in the womb for NINE months. And premature life, whatever that is, is still life.

Date10:51:29, December 02, 2005 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Messagewhatever. What does this actually mean?

Date10:51:32, December 02, 2005 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Messagewhatever. What does this actually mean?

Date10:51:34, December 02, 2005 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Messagewhatever. What does this actually mean?

Date02:27:20, December 03, 2005 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
MessageThe Tribal Council has ratified this treaty.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 241

no
  

Total Seats: 0

abstain
  

Total Seats: 58


Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots.

Random quote: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69