We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Rightist Party

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor^[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2149

Description^[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=118">Rights of the Unborn</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Article 1

Ratify the Rights of the Unborn.

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	18:27:41, November 27, 2005 CET
From	Inactive
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	We oppose. Where is the option for no abortion at all? Also, murder during first trimester is still murder.

Date	18:27:59, November 27, 2005 CET
From	Inactive
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	We also have to add it is a ver misleading title.

Date	05:05:59, November 28, 2005 CET
From	Patriot Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	We'll support the treaty.

Date	19:48:28, November 28, 2005 CET
From	Social-Conservative party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	We oppose such a harsh form of "Rights", although we have nothing against the basis, that unborn babies should not be gotten rid of, there are situations where we feel it is a nessesary thing and we should regulate, but not as harshly as this one.

Date	21:07:40, November 28, 2005 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	What's wrong with it? We already limit abortion to medical emergencies only and that is within the treaty.

Date	22:31:38, November 28, 2005 CET
From	One Nation Socialist Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	With moderation, theultimate choice should be with the mother. I don't see why before the baby has grown into a human and tasted life it can't be aborted. Obviousley this is a sensitive issue with many so i think that we could all agree on the moderate option of abortion being made legal during the first trimester.

Date	00:13:15, November 29, 2005 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	Even though it has been proven that life begins at conception? No one denies that anymore.

Date	13:22:12, November 30, 2005 CET
From	One Nation Socialist Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	premature life begins at contraception. Will the baby really miss sitting in its mothers womb for a year and a half. Also murdering in the first trimester isn't murder as the baby yet has 2 develop into a human form. Murder by my definition (homicide) is taking away the life of living being that had specifically chosen 2 live. The baby isn't yet a being during the first trimester and therefore, obviously, can't make that specific choice. Furthermore it hasn't been alive and thus has no life 2 be taken away.

Date	14:06:53, November 30, 2005 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	A year and a half? A human baby is in the womb for NINE months. And premature life, whatever that is, is still life.

Date	10:51:29, December 02, 2005 CET
From	One Nation Socialist Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	whatever. What does this actually mean?

Date	10:51:32, December 02, 2005 CET
From	One Nation Socialist Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	whatever. What does this actually mean?

Date	10:51:34, December 02, 2005 CET
From	One Nation Socialist Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	whatever. What does this actually mean?

Date	02:27:20, December 03, 2005 CET
From	Patriot Party
To	Debating the Ratification of the Rights of the Unborn
Message	The Tribal Council has ratified this treaty.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 241

One Nation Socialist Party (0)
Social-Conservative party (0)

Total Seats: 0

abstain

Inactive (58)
sweetdev Party (0)

Total Seats: 58

Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302

Random quote: “Their cheap talk of the 'greater good' is a thinly concealed excuse for subordinating the people to the institutionalized violence that is the state.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69