Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:09:02
Server time: 19:50:57, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Defense and Energy

Details

Submitted by[?]: Modern Economic Party of Cobura

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2148

Description[?]:

give the government some control

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:12:53, November 28, 2005 CET
From Fatherland Bloc
ToDebating the Defense and Energy
MessageI agree, except I have no seats so it does not really matter.

Date23:51:27, November 28, 2005 CET
From Zapatista Party
ToDebating the Defense and Energy
MessageI think the stupid GRP have taken place of the BGP!

Date02:35:29, November 29, 2005 CET
From Modern Economic Party of Cobura
ToDebating the Defense and Energy
Messagegood

Date03:47:04, November 29, 2005 CET
From Zapatista Party
ToDebating the Defense and Energy
MessageHows that good? That sucks! Idiotic GRP.

Date01:49:54, November 30, 2005 CET
From Modern Economic Party of Cobura
ToDebating the Defense and Energy
Messagegrp is being smart not stupid

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 252

no
  

Total Seats: 128

abstain
 

Total Seats: 20


Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German").

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61