We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Industrial Pollution Deregulation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party of Valruzia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2148
Description[?]:
| You know our stance... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Current: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Proposed: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:24:17, November 29, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Industrial Pollution Deregulation Act |
| Message | No. Yes. No. |
| Date | 12:59:14, November 29, 2005 CET | From |  Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Industrial Pollution Deregulation Act |
| Message | 1: No 2: How about the moderate restrictive? Take one step at a time :) |
| Date | 20:40:45, November 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Valruzia | To | Debating the Industrial Pollution Deregulation Act |
| Message | you guys are pains in the ass... |
| Date | 00:25:19, November 30, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Industrial Pollution Deregulation Act |
| Message | Well, see it this way. After this has passed, you can do another one with the guidelines so that your visibility improves even more :) |
| Date | 03:00:22, November 30, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Industrial Pollution Deregulation Act |
| Message | If we all voted with you exactly, we'd all have tiny little parties. |
| Date | 04:35:14, November 30, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Industrial Pollution Deregulation Act |
| Message | We fear things with "highly restrictive" in them. Isn't there an economic incentives option? I forget |
| Date | 13:19:06, November 30, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Industrial Pollution Deregulation Act |
| Message | @ANL: Yeah, because you are sooooo much bigger than me[/sarcasm] |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 77 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 93 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 31 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
| Random quote: "The fate of the living planet is the most important issue facing mankind". - Gaylord Nelson |