Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5479
Next month in: 00:23:52
Server time: 07:36:07, May 07, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Legislation for Updated Foreign Policy I

Details

Submitted by[?]: Positive Progression Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3264

Description[?]:

The foreign policy of the nation is outdated and needs to be updated. This bill seeks to do that while promoting the best possible course of action for the Kingdom of Solentia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:51:30, February 23, 2012 CET
FromAgudat National Party
ToDebating the Legislation for Updated Foreign Policy I
MessageThe JSBP must oppose section one of this bill, why would we strip our diplomatic staff of all immunity?Any nation could take advantage of this and arrest our diplomats without just cause. Also section three we are wary of, we must protect our nation from terrorism. Relaxing our strict measures would in our opinion put the people at risk.

Date02:56:24, February 23, 2012 CET
FromPositive Progression Party
ToDebating the Legislation for Updated Foreign Policy I
MessageGiven the current technology, we should not be sending human diplomats to nations that hate us enough to arrest them. We should be using something much more safe, something over the Internet.
As for section three, relaxing our strict measures would also increase immigration. I can see your fear, and if the other parties are kind enough to weigh in on the issue, I will be fine removing the proposal if it means the rest of the bill will pass.

Date02:56:28, February 23, 2012 CET
FromPositive Progression Party
ToDebating the Legislation for Updated Foreign Policy I
MessageGiven the current technology, we should not be sending human diplomats to nations that hate us enough to arrest them. We should be using something much more safe, something over the Internet.
As for section three, relaxing our strict measures would also increase immigration. I can see your fear, and if the other parties are kind enough to weigh in on the issue, I will be fine removing the proposal if it means the rest of the bill will pass.

Date16:52:20, February 23, 2012 CET
FromCoalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Legislation for Updated Foreign Policy I
Message"The Unionists oppose Articles 1 and 2 and so must object."

George Manell-Ohlir,
Unionist Spokesman for Foreign Affairs & Populist Party Liaison Officer

Date17:36:03, February 23, 2012 CET
FromMeritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the Legislation for Updated Foreign Policy I
MessageWhile we are not pleased with article two, we are wiling to vote on the majority of the bill and return foreign aid to its intended good-will giving.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 56

no
 

Total Seats: 19

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "I am a conservative to preserve all that is good in our constitution, a radical to remove all that is bad. I seek to preserve property and to respect order, and I equally decry the appeal to the passions of the many or the prejudices of the few." - Benjamin Disraeli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 71