Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5470
Next month in: 02:12:26
Server time: 09:47:33, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Anti-Federalist Reform

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Imperial Party of Telamon

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3266

Description[?]:

These proposals shift power in non critical areas to local govenrments.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:45:08, February 29, 2012 CET
FromNational Imperial Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Anti-Federalist Reform
MessageLong live the Empire! We open debate and begin voting.

Date00:51:49, February 29, 2012 CET
FromRed Police Party
ToDebating the Anti-Federalist Reform
MessageMr. Speaker,

We are unfortunately 100% against these measures. Our citizens want a strong and stable government, and a strong and stable government must be able to control the facets of the nation all through one tap. The federal government, in our humble opinion, must remain in power for these measures.

We will not yet vote nay, as we are interested in the debate of this legislation.

Date01:38:42, February 29, 2012 CET
FromCatholic Political Union
ToDebating the Anti-Federalist Reform
MessageMr. Speaker,

We oppose Article 1 because some sites are of such national and historic importance that it is inappropriate to subject them to the whims of local politicians who might decide to demolish them or sell them off to private owners.

We oppose Article 2 because although our energy industry needs to be reformed, we are not sure handing it to local government is the right answer.

We oppose Article 3 because we are not satisfied that, left to themselves, every council in the land would provide a decent fire service. Some of them might be tempted by cheap options.

We oppose Article 4 because many of our public works projects have a regional or national significance, and simply would not be invested in were it left entirely to local government.

Leroy Adams
(Chairman of the CPU)

Date02:59:33, February 29, 2012 CET
FromNational Imperial Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Anti-Federalist Reform
MessageLord Speaker,

Doth the federal government truly need the burden of so much negligible duties, I would much rather have my neighbor controlling my home region than a professional politician in the Capital.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 237

no
    

Total Seats: 444

abstain
 

Total Seats: 69


Random fact: All role-play must respect the established cultural background in Culturally Protected nations.

Random quote: "Idealism is fine; but as it approaches reality, the cost becomes prohibitive." - William F. Buckley, Jr.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70