We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: LSP Internationalist Reforms Act of 3268
Details
Submitted by[?]: House Stafford
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3269
Description[?]:
| new bill |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Proposed: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning immigration.
Old value:: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Current: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Proposed: Everyone is allowed to reside permanently in this nation.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards giving aid to foreign countries.
Old value:: The government supplies "tied" aid to poorer nations in return for trading rights.
Current: The government gives moderate aid to countries in need.
Proposed: The government gives high levels of aid to countries in need.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Current: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Proposed: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:48:28, March 05, 2012 CET | From | Red Police Party | To | Debating the LSP Internationalist Reforms Act of 3268 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, In current international tensions, this bill will destroy the safety fence surrounding Telamon, and will open the oppurtunity for many acts of terror that will cost Telamonese lives. There is no moral base for supporting this bill, and we are frankly disturbed to see this on the legislature. The IRP and the LSP must improve their international knowledge, we simply cannot take a risk like this in the current situation of Terra. Tyler Difan Minister of Defense Seconded by: James Clark Head of International Relations, Ministry of Defense |
| Date | 03:25:42, March 07, 2012 CET | From | Democratic Action Party | To | Debating the LSP Internationalist Reforms Act of 3268 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I'm afraid that Article 2 is a deal-breaker for the DAP. The economic disruption would be... extreme. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 201 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 399 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
| Random quote: "There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America." - Bill Clinton |