We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Legislative Assembly Reform of 3268
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nationalist Imperial Association (IA)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3269
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 105
Current: 529
Proposed: 480
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:04:45, March 05, 2012 CET | From | Luthori Tory Party | To | Debating the Legislative Assembly Reform of 3268 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, While some reform to the size ofthe Imperial Diet is undoubtedly desirable, His Majesty's Government is concerned that the present proposed number would lead to deadlock, and would prefer an odd number be chosen. I yield the floor. |
| Date | 16:51:16, March 05, 2012 CET | From | New Luthori Reformists (NLR) | To | Debating the Legislative Assembly Reform of 3268 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, At the current time, there is difficulty with any sort of valid representation of the population with regards to seats. Additionally, deadlock is very unlikely with the presence of 5 parties as is. Perhaps we ought to allow this to pass, and alter it if a situation calls for it in the future. I yield. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 9 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 94 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 2 |
| Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362 |
| Random quote: "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself." - Thomas Paine |