Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:05:12
Server time: 19:54:47, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Rewording the Constitution

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party/Church of Kalistan

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2150

Description[?]:

We really do need to change some names. I'm open for debate, but our names are quite mixed with other principals stated in our Constitution.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:10:30, November 30, 2005 CET
FromPansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageIf you were truly open to suggestions, you would not have moved directly into voting.

Date01:17:24, November 30, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageThat was a mistake, you'll need to bear with me, I'm still learning how this game opperates.

Date03:35:53, November 30, 2005 CET
FromFarmers' Militia
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageHm, UK over Germany... I don't really have any preference. But if we are going to make changes to the names of our government bodies, we might as well really stretch. This asks to go from one general run-of-the-mill name to another general run-of-the-mill name.

I wouldn't mind change though, just to something spiffy.

Date03:43:40, November 30, 2005 CET
FromPansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageYeah. We need something cool.

Date10:39:27, December 01, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Front of Kalistan
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageChange "Parliament" to "Council" :d

Date13:42:27, December 01, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageI was actually thinking of Grand Council. If I'm not mistaken, that is used by another nation, but only one other nation.

How do you all feel about Prime Minister and Chancellor?

Date20:30:45, December 01, 2005 CET
FromNational Fiscal Group
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageA bit bland, to tell the truth.

High Chancellor, First Councillor, Grand Council?

Date23:21:36, December 01, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageHow about High Chancellor, Grand Council and we have a Presidential system where the President is both Head of State and Head of Government.

Or we could have a hereditary Monarchy in which we have Grand Emporer, High Chancellor, and Grand Council.

Date08:03:19, December 02, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Patriots' League
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageGrand Chancellor, Grand Council...reminds me of my NS nation.

Date10:21:50, December 02, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Front of Kalistan
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageSpell emperor right. Furthermore article 1 is not satisfactory.

Date13:06:37, December 02, 2005 CET
FromNational Fiscal Group
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageTechnically, a republic can't have a hereditary HoS.

Date13:29:02, December 02, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party/Church of Kalistan
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageHow does this look?

Date23:28:25, December 02, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Front of Kalistan
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageAah Article 1 panic attack! RD:~1

Date12:00:33, December 03, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Front of Kalistan
ToDebating the Rewording the Constitution
MessageWe can't have this go through with §1 still in. Sorry :@

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 105

no
    

Total Seats: 84

abstain
    

Total Seats: 24


Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity.

Random quote: “Their cheap talk of the 'greater good' is a thinly concealed excuse for subordinating the people to the institutionalized violence that is the state.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 86