We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: c6
Details
Submitted by[?]: Stanton House
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3271
Description[?]:
| as thay is get more parety i will, remore to chane do this law |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The total number of seats in the legislative assembly. Should be between 75 and 750.
Old value:: 500
Current: 750
Proposed: 750
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:13:12, March 09, 2012 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the c6 |
| Message | can you tell me how you are going to vote and no and what can i do to chaneg you vote thank |
| Date | 22:59:20, March 09, 2012 CET | From |  Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the c6 |
| Message | I think all parties should be able to propose a cabinet. I have no problem with separation of head of state and head of government, however it's obvious that you're playing politics. When your party held both "Head of State" and "Head of Government" positions, other parties were powerless, even though (united) we had more seats. Your party is the largest single party, but we make up a bigger unit as a coalition. You're upset that I'm now head of state and head of government, so you want to change the law to suit yourself so that all the cabinet can belong to you again. |
| Date | 00:09:55, March 10, 2012 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the c6 |
| Message | no i feet thet the with the new party will need to change the stymer i will be fell but will chanege this on i n only will need to chanege bouth a the is 4 party not 3 about how can propose at the time this will indouter the puble with ask for by 100% that why it was chane now io feet that is worst for the party so the syment need to be change |
| Date | 17:28:01, March 12, 2012 CET | From | New Luthori Reformists (NLR) | To | Debating the c6 |
| Message | OOC: Sorry for interrupting Beluzian politics, but I lol'd. Hard. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 313 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 187 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson |