We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Kirlawa Freedom of Self Defense Initiative
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kirlawa Liberty Movement (KLM)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3274
Description[?]:
| Kirlawa should not have any regulations on weaponry beyond a few regulations on the production and distribution of weapons. Individuals buying a gun shall undergo no regulations beyond a basic background check. All guns shall be legal for the populace to own, assuming the individual buying the weapon passes the background check. Tanks, Planes, Ships, and other heavy weaponry will be allowed for all individuals and corporations as well. That said, the use of these weapons shall be severely prohibited outside of self defense. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapon concealment.
Old value:: Where weapons are carried, this must be done openly.
Current: Any legal weapon may be concealed when carried.
Proposed: Any legal weapon may be concealed when carried.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals may own guns under strict license conditions.
Current: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Proposed: Individuals are allowed to own firearms as long as they do not have a history of dangerous mental illness or a violent criminality.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:08:50, March 15, 2012 CET | From | Kirlawa Liberty Movement (KLM) | To | Debating the Kirlawa Freedom of Self Defense Initiative |
| Message | How can you justify not allowing lawful individuals the right to defend themselves? Why is the state allowed to own weapons but individuals are not? You don't see this as a clear hypocrisy? Beyond that, why should I be forced to be defenseless by the state? Private property owners (such as stores) could still ban weapons on their premises, so I fail to see how you could be opposed to this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |
| no | Total Seats: 717 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself. |
| Random quote: "Politics is the system of depriving the proletariat of their power." - Karl Marx |