We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget 3276: II
Details
Submitted by[?]: Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3278
Description[?]:
| The Unionist Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Kingdom of Solentia. |
Proposals
Article 1
| Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
| Head of Government | 0 SOL | 100,000,000 SOL | 75,000,000 SOL |
| Foreign Affairs | 0 SOL | 20,000,000,000 SOL | 10,000,000,000 SOL |
| Internal Affairs | 0 SOL | 10,000,000 SOL | 10,000,000 SOL |
| Finance | 0 SOL | 25,000,000,000 SOL | 20,000,000,000 SOL |
| Defence | 0 SOL | 55,000,000,000 SOL | 50,000,000,000 SOL |
| Justice | 0 SOL | 30,000,000,000 SOL | 27,500,000,000 SOL |
| Infrastructure and Transport | 0 SOL | 100,000,000,000 SOL | 100,000,000,000 SOL |
| Health and Social Services | 0 SOL | 100,000,000,000 SOL | 110,001,000,000 SOL |
| Education and Culture | 0 SOL | 180,000,000,000 SOL | 180,001,000,000 SOL |
| Science and Technology | 0 SOL | 75,000,000,000 SOL | 74,000,000,000 SOL |
| Food and Agriculture | 0 SOL | 40,000,000,000 SOL | 37,500,000,000 SOL |
| Environment and Tourism | 0 SOL | 50,000,000,000 SOL | 50,001,000,000 SOL |
| Trade and Industry | 0 SOL | 60,000,000,000 SOL | 57,500,000,000 SOL |
| Total | 0 SOL | 735,110,000,000 SOL | 716,588,000,000 SOL |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:25:28, March 21, 2012 CET | From |  Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Budget 3276: II |
| Message | "Mr. Speaker, I commend this budget to the house. This second half of the budget proposal is vital to fundung those tax plans that we have made in Part I. This budget proposal sees us cutting expenditure where services have been privatised or outsourced to other places and sees us re-invest £1m in Health Services, £1m in Education Services and £1 in creating a low-carbon economy to be spent on our Governmental projects to boost the health, sustainability and employabiltiy of those same people that we are cutting taxes for at the very bottom of our society." - Henry Spence-Jones, Secretary of State for Finance & Economica Unionist Vice-President (Events, Policy & Democracy) |
| Date | 00:56:30, March 22, 2012 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Budget 3276: II |
| Message | Obviously we are not happy with seeing the Military budget reduced. |
| Date | 01:33:48, March 22, 2012 CET | From | Positive Progression Party | To | Debating the Budget 3276: II |
| Message | "The Renewal Party concurs with the Crowns. While yes, peace is something that we strive for, all peace is is a gap of war. Te only way peace will be achieved is when all people have equal respect for each other, in essence, equal military power. Reducing military funds will not prompt others to reduce their funds, but rather to take advantage in our loss of power." Samuel Clines Renewal Party Counselor of Defense |
| Date | 02:16:12, March 22, 2012 CET | From | Positive Progression Party | To | Debating the Budget 3276: II |
| Message | For the information of the Unionists... "The Renewal Party has clearly stated that we do not want military funds reduced. For the sake of debate and Solentia, the Renewal Party would like to make it known to the Unionists that we shall not vote yea on any spending bill that reduces military funds. In addition, any tax proposals that are paired with the inadequate spending bill will also be voted against or abstained, simply because to vote for one and not the other would throw all of Solentia's economy out of whack. We await the Unionists' move. We hope, for all of Solentia, they shall respond to the Crowns' and our recommendations." Samuel Clines |
| Date | 03:13:56, March 22, 2012 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Budget 3276: II |
| Message | We could accept the bill as-is, but we would like the military spending restored as soon as prudent. |
| Date | 22:59:23, March 22, 2012 CET | From | Positive Progression Party | To | Debating the Budget 3276: II |
| Message | "We shall change our stance and accept this bill. However, liek the Crowns, we would like the military spending fixed as soon as possible. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 280 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 145 |
| Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
| Random quote: "Envy is the cause of political division." - Democritus |