Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:12:21
Server time: 18:47:38, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): JourneyKan | Mindus | VojmatDunDSU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Decreasing debt

Details

Submitted by[?]: Redneck Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2149

Description[?]:

We have had proposals lately that on the surface want to decrease debt. This bill will actually do just that.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:57:55, November 30, 2005 CET
FromSeosavists Republican party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageThat's not how you propose a budget or tax bill. You have to go to the cabinet then cabinet abilities.

Date18:02:08, November 30, 2005 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageThat isn't the point at the moment. We will propose laws that cut the governments wasteful spending. In turn, we will see who among us is serious about decreasing debt.

Date18:16:12, November 30, 2005 CET
FromSeosavists Republican party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageThis doesn't decrease debt at all, are you really that stupid? ONLY A BUDGET OR TAX PROPOSAL WILL DECREASE DEBT!

Date18:27:45, November 30, 2005 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageNo, not only. Currently, we spend money on these wasteful and unneeded laws. The money we put in the budget has to come from somewhere. And since we currently have massive debt, we must cut the spending before we adjust the budget, or raise taxes. Debts do not magically disappear without said cuts.

Raising taxes and changing the budget alone will only allow us to not fall further in debt. We're after total elimination.

Date20:59:08, November 30, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageI must ask you to reconsider article 2.

Date21:49:07, November 30, 2005 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageMight I ask why?

Date22:06:38, November 30, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageState farms? We'll ask Joe Stalin to them shall we?

Date22:27:42, November 30, 2005 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageChanged

Date23:01:25, November 30, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageWe'd prefer ecological subsidies (the current policy) or no subsidies at all. This proposal rewards failure.

Date23:05:44, November 30, 2005 CET
FromRedneck Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageTotally removed then..

The RNP thought about that issue, and came to the conclusion that total removel may hurt us in an election, as we allow only landowners the right to vote. And we believe the greatest deal of landowners hard working farmers..

Date23:36:01, November 30, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageThanks for listening, you have our votes. SRP is getting very personal: just like NFP did towards the end.

Date01:19:47, December 01, 2005 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageWe're not happy with the last three, but I agree with the rest.

Date02:32:49, December 01, 2005 CET
FromUnited Conservative Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageThanks for the changes.

YES.

Date05:21:58, December 01, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageThis does not actually decrease debt, it only shows your contempt for the people of Luthori.

Date05:23:38, December 01, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageAnyone who votes yes for this bill is economically and politically ignorant.

Date08:52:29, December 01, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageThis will save billions of pounds: where's the contempt for the Luthori people?

Date10:10:10, December 01, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageThis will save billions of pounds at the expense of the poor and low-income Luthori citizens by taking away necessary services. Therefore contempt.

Date10:49:12, December 01, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageWhat necessary services does this remove from the poor? Commercial-free TV and radio?

Date12:23:20, December 01, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageArticles Four, Five, Seven and Eight.

Date13:22:47, December 01, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Decreasing debt
MessageArticles 4, 7 and 8 have nothing to do with Luthori Citizens. Article 5 simply prevents freeloaders from living off the state indefinitely.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 441

no
  

Total Seats: 84

abstain
   

Total Seats: 114


Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy.

Random quote: "Hunger is not the worst feature of unemployment; idleness is." - William E. Barrett

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 126