We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 3287
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rutania Peoples Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3288
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Social Republican Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Rutania Peoples Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Rutanian Democratic Alliance
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Rutanian Democratic Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Social Republican Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Rutanian Democratic Alliance
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Social Republican Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Rutania Peoples Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Rutanian Democratic Alliance
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Social Republican Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Social Republican Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Rutanian Democratic Alliance
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Social Republican Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:10:27, April 12, 2012 CET | From | Social Republican Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3287 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, while we congratulate the Tea Party to its substantial electoral success, we feel that government shouldn't stand on a broader base than necessary. On the other hand, should the Liberal Party not be interested in our government proposal, we would certainly consider the possibility of an SRP/Tea Party/Constitutional coalition. Bryan Tersigni SRP General Secretary |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 73 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 526 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
Random quote: "I am working for the time when unqualified blacks, browns, and women join the unqualified men in running our government." - Cissy Farenthold |