We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: b5a1
Details
Submitted by[?]: Stanton House
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3294
Description[?]:
| b5a1 |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Train Operating Companies (TOC).
Old value:: Private companies operate regional TOC's. The national service is provided by a publicly owned, national TOC.
Current: There is a single publicly owned TOC.
Proposed: The State owns and operates a national TOC, alongside private TOCs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:06:20, April 24, 2012 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the b5a1 |
| Message | the sate owne the national TOC and ever Parish have one TOC and ever city have a TOC |
| Date | 15:28:31, April 24, 2012 CET | From |  Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the b5a1 |
| Message | What is wrong with the current law? I think the current law is fine. The civil government operates a national TOC while private companies operate TOCs in different regions. |
| Date | 18:04:30, April 24, 2012 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the b5a1 |
| Message | the law do not said how mucrch private TOC run in a regions |
| Date | 18:17:56, April 24, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the b5a1 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Neither of the variations of the law state how many private TOCs will be in each region. A publicly-owned TOC will connect all the major cities, and private TOCs may operate on whatever routes they want. Nothing is wrong with the current law. |
| Date | 00:52:32, April 25, 2012 CET | From | Patterson House | To | Debating the b5a1 |
| Message | The law seems to be fine as it is. |
| Date | 05:56:49, April 25, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the b5a1 |
| Message | We thank the Patterson House for understanding our view. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 45 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 54 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: We are in politics not because we hate our fellow man, but because we love him. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Part |