Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 01:00:06
Server time: 06:59:53, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Taxation plan: Trying again

Details

Submitted by[?]: International Society of Bankers

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2150

Description[?]:

For the good of Lodamun...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:57:40, December 02, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageStrongly opposed to regressive taxes on essential goods.

Date04:29:43, December 02, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageSupported, though the taxation level might be a bit too high

Date04:29:52, December 02, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageMore than is needed, that is

Date04:40:20, December 02, 2005 CET
FromInternational Society of Bankers
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageWould you mind it being 3% essential and 5% luxury then?

Date04:46:55, December 02, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageWell, the only reason we object to a 2 level sales tax is because it opens the door for everyone to want their product classified as "essential". That, and the rich spend more of their income on "essential" goods, such as food, housing, and clothing, than the poor do anyway, so it defeats the purpose. Allowing the government to apply bias in the taxation rates is what we oppose.

Date05:25:15, December 02, 2005 CET
FromInternational Society of Bankers
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageStill though, it would make it easier on the lower class, allowing them to climb the economic ladder faster.

Date05:49:31, December 02, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageThe lower class needs cars too, the lower class needs other "luxury" goods just as much as anyone else.

If you want to exempt everything the "lower class" needs, you'll end up with the only luxury goods being charter jets and caviar.

Date08:45:10, December 02, 2005 CET
FromInternational Society of Bankers
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageBut such basics as food are necessary and should be exempt from such high taxes. I understand what you are trying to say but it clearly defices essential goods, food and basic clothing.

Date09:21:28, December 02, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
Messagetaxes are the root of all evil.

Date04:41:17, December 03, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageWe urge the DSPL to vote against taxes on essential goods - they go against everything leftists stand for.

Date10:55:29, December 03, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageAaahh what happened to lodamun?? Now the capitalists are introducing taxes...

Date05:28:18, December 04, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Taxation plan: Trying again
MessageThe Ministries of Truth and the MInistry of Love costs money...

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 187

no
   

Total Seats: 65

abstain
  

Total Seats: 48


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker).

Random quote: "If there's anything a public servant hates to do it's something for the public." - Kin Hubbard

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67