We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of June 3299
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patterson House
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3300
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Patterson House
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Williams Family
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Stanton House
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Williams Family
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Stanton House
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Williams Family
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Patterson House
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Stanton House
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Stanton House
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Patterson House
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Patterson House
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Patterson House
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Williams Family
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:14:22, May 06, 2012 CET | From | Williams Family | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3299 |
| Message | And this is what happens when people are too stubborn and unwilling to compromise... :/ (Karavs) |
| Date | 03:23:31, May 06, 2012 CET | From |  Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3299 |
| Message | The only reasons we voted "No" are: 1) You gave Finance to the Tories. 2) You gave the Ministry of Defence to a family that doesn't even control a military. The bill will pass, anyway. Congratulations on the new cabinet. |
| Date | 03:30:29, May 06, 2012 CET | From | Williams Family | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3299 |
| Message | I'm voting Yes because I'm tired of failed proposals...the second time the Tories didn't get Finance and they opposed it so even if the Karavs didn't oppose because they didn't like who defence went to - it would still have failed. I'm confusing myself just talking about all the conditions everyone sets. I don't personally think the Tories are good at finance - nor do I necessarily think that Defence should go to a family with no military - but I do think the silly fuss over forming a cabinet needs to stop. :/ It wouldn't even be funny if the Tories found a reason to vote No now... :/ OOC : If that happens I give up on this, I'll go play WoW again. -___-" |
| Date | 03:31:43, May 06, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3299 |
| Message | It's not like there isn't a functional cabinet. There is. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 60 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 28 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 11 |
| Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer". |
| Random quote: "Politics have no relation to morals." - Niccolo Machiavelli |