We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ameliorate Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3310
Description[?]:
| Bringing power back to the people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The banking system.
Old value:: The government operates a central bank and all other banks are private.
Current: The government operates a central bank and all other banks are private.
Proposed: The government operates and owns all banks.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: Emperor
Current: Hldjez'shprpzi Manil VI, wrzy Jelbék H'an, grzy hldjomek Jeztaghaék Kahegrm Abshrmojadhiko yrzy Nubajrkaék Bék (His Exalted Highness, elected by the Great Kurultai, Manil VI, Khan of Jelbe, Great Purple Wolf, Supreme Commander of the Great Jelbek Horde, Lord of the Great Perimor Steppe, Bek of the royal clan of Nubajrka)
Proposed: President
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The national motto.
Old value:: For the Emperor and the Empire!
Current: Kez orzy Rímsa drzy ajozuo (Strength is in Justice)
Proposed: He who holds the trust and commitment of the people, truly holds the power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:57:32, May 28, 2012 CET | From | Jelbanian Democratic Party | To | Debating the Freedom Bill |
| Message | Although we didn't vote on this, the Freedom Party was adamantly against this Bill because of Article 3. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 700 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite." - John Kenneth Galbraith |