We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Citizen's Rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sozialistische Einheitspartei Dundorfs
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3316
Description[?]:
| A firm view of my party concerning civil rights, Joachim Breitner SED Parteivorsitzender |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to adultery.
Old value:: There is no explicit government policy on adultery.
Current: Adultery is legal.
Proposed: Adultery is legal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning crossdressing.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: Crossdressing is allowed.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:57:59, May 30, 2012 CET | From | Konservative Partei | To | Debating the Citizen's Rights |
| Message | What a joke that you claim your party stands for "civil rights" when you want to lock up people for thoughtcrimes. I'm amazed you can speak coherently, Herr Breitner, given that you're filled to the brim with hypocrisy. (Riotous laughter from the conservative benches.) - Sophia Rietzschel, Bundeskanzlerin (KP). |
| Date | 07:36:51, May 31, 2012 CET | From | Sozialistische Einheitspartei Dundorfs | To | Debating the Citizen's Rights |
| Message | Frau Rietzschel, proposing bills like this are a joke: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=348391 . However, no one is laughing. Laurenz Brandt Minister of Justice |
| Date | 07:42:31, June 01, 2012 CET | From | Konservative Partei | To | Debating the Citizen's Rights |
| Message | Herr Brandt, we are able to summon arguments for and against the legislation that comes before this house. We argued substantively in favour of our bill on the death penalty. You, on the other hand, simply state that opposing the death penalty is your "view" without ever justifying it. You call our policy a "joke" without so much as bringing a single counter-argument. This is a pattern for the SED: propose legislation and don't bother to engage in any type of debate. Your colleague, the finance minister, is the prime example of this. He has suddenly gone missing from the debate over that ridiculous tax plan of his, presumably because he is embarrassed at having proposed a bill that steals from the poor and therefore does the exact opposite of what he intended it to do. - Sophia Rietzschel, Bundeskanzlerin (KP). |
| Date | 07:43:38, June 01, 2012 CET | From | Konservative Partei | To | Debating the Citizen's Rights |
| Message | [OOC: Sorry, I copy-pasted the "Sophia Rietzschel, Bundeskanzlerin" bit from above without thinking. That should obviously be "Sophia Rietzschel, Vorsitzende der Konservativen Partei" now.] |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 299 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 201 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "Whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither, in my opinion, is safe." - Edmund Burke |