We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Resolution on expanding Legislative discourse
Details
Submitted by[?]: Green Axiom Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3319
Description[?]:
| This nonbinding resolution encourages all political parties to participate more frequently on debates, especially those with the purpose of changing laws, as serious discussions will surely promote freedom and make sure everybody is heard before any decisions are made. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:34:49, June 13, 2012 CET | From |  Imperial National Party | To | Debating the Resolution on expanding Legislative discourse |
| Message | No |
| Date | 18:49:39, June 13, 2012 CET | From | Green Axiom Party | To | Debating the Resolution on expanding Legislative discourse |
| Message | To me it sounds like you want to continue voting randomly and flip flopping without being held accountable, the least we can do for our constituency is to give them the reason of our choices. |
| Date | 19:48:37, June 13, 2012 CET | From | Individualistic Movement | To | Debating the Resolution on expanding Legislative discourse |
| Message | That's INP... Not really open to arguments. I support your idea, i would like more debate! :) |
| Date | 20:04:18, June 13, 2012 CET | From | Green Axiom Party | To | Debating the Resolution on expanding Legislative discourse |
| Message | thanks IM, I think it's best that parties introducing a bill give their reasons on why they think change is needed, and other parties, rather than merely voting, state their opinion and engage in a conversation. |
| Date | 20:24:39, June 13, 2012 CET | From | Imperial National Party | To | Debating the Resolution on expanding Legislative discourse |
| Message | Flip flopping? You will not get anywhere calling us flip floppers. |
| Date | 20:32:37, June 13, 2012 CET | From | Imperial National Party | To | Debating the Resolution on expanding Legislative discourse |
| Message | We support debate and discussion. Given though the past recent elections the IM has a complete hold over this Body and the Executive offices. With their little puppet party they can do as they please without have a debate. We will engage in debate when we see fit. However, we will retain the right to put forward bills, resolutions, acts and other pieces of legislation without the need of debate if we can will it. -Cornelius Royaliwith Chairman of the Imperial National Party |
| Date | 15:17:51, June 14, 2012 CET | From | Green Axiom Party | To | Debating the Resolution on expanding Legislative discourse |
| Message | Voting on the resolution is of course pure formality. voting show if the parties support the premise of the resolution or not. If passed, It doesn't enforce any binding law, neither on our citizens nor the parties. |
| Date | 18:14:41, June 14, 2012 CET | From | Individualistic Movement | To | Debating the Resolution on expanding Legislative discourse |
| Message | Your damn right, bro! :p ;) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 197 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 15 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 1 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: "A return to first principles in a republic is sometimes caused by the simple virtues of one man. His good example has such an influence that the good men strive to imitate him, and the wicked are ashamed to lead a life so contrary to his example." - Niccolo Machiavelli |