Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:14:07
Server time: 20:45:52, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): chrismcsherbert | JourneyKan | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Executive titles act (2050)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Cooperative Commonwealth Federation

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2051

Description[?]:

The head of state shall be permitted to select their own title.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:52:38, May 08, 2005 CET
FromMLTP (The Resistance)
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageWoo and Yay.

Date05:56:27, May 08, 2005 CET
FromMLTP (The Resistance)
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
Message+100 points for Gilbert and Sullivanism, by the by.

Date08:13:40, May 08, 2005 CET
FromLodamun Centre-Left Coalition
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageUh.... you weren't drunk perchance? ;P

Date17:21:41, May 08, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
Message(No! The Fascists have hacked the CCF's account!)

Seriously, how about Premier, Chancellor, Consul or Chieftain?

Date12:02:36, May 09, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageWhy change it at all?

Date15:23:34, May 09, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageJust to have some fun with it, really.

Date19:29:29, May 09, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageAlbert would respectfully subject the following suggestions:

"The Grand Poobar"
"Poobar-in-Chief"
"His/Her Executive Poobarness"

Date21:24:11, May 09, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageWait, we're having fun with the title of our head of state, but our motto needs to be more serious? :D

Date21:46:39, May 09, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageOh, i'm convinced by the "fun motto" argument. But i'd hate to cancel a bill that let people argue about who was the most libertarian. ;)

How about Governor-General as head of state? It's Commonwealth-y!

Date22:03:07, May 09, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageGah, I'm done with that. *lol*

Governor-General sounds too military, even if General's not meant in that sense.

Honestly, I like leaving it as President. That way I can have my head of state as President Councillor, and you guys don't have to. :D

Date22:08:32, May 09, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageI quite like President really. But don't mind hearing alternatives.

We could go for El Presidente and be a banana republic.

Date22:09:00, May 09, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageI don't speak Spanish. :(

Date22:22:17, May 09, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageWell, we could change President to President Councillor....

Date23:02:10, May 09, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageSee, I didn't propose that because I can do it myself by adding Councillor to the beginning of my candidate's name, and because I didn't know if any other parties would use the term. I'm with Albert as far as liking just President since it allows me my choice and does not force others to use Councillor if they don't want to.

Date04:08:29, May 10, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageHow about there is no title? Just a space. You can choose your own title for your candidate, and if your candidate's ego is reasonable enough to not want a title, he/she doesn't have to take one.

Date05:43:06, May 10, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageCan we do that? I wouldn't object.

Date15:51:19, May 10, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageI assumed it would require something entered in the field, but in fact a blank space works. That change has been made.

Date23:25:56, May 10, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
Message(Sweet, put it to a vote then)

Date17:25:18, May 11, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Executive titles act (2050)
MessageOK, text amended and moved to a vote now that the election is over.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 94

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation.

    Random quote: "I am interested in politics so that one day I will not have to be interested in politics." - Ayn Rand

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 82