Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 00:08:12
Server time: 19:51:47, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Paulo Nogueira | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: FP, RSDP, CP backed regulation of Media Content

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2152

Description[?]:

Article 19 (The government's policy regarding regulation of media content.)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:23:47, December 04, 2005 CET
FromRadical Freedom Party
ToDebating the FP, RSDP, CP backed regulation of Media Content
MessageWe stand opposed to this nanny-state approach to media content.

Date21:39:17, December 04, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the FP, RSDP, CP backed regulation of Media Content
MessageNanny-state approach? We feel that it is necessary to prevent the media from turning into a "nanny"! We must protect our children from manipulation by the media, we must ensure to our children the right to receive correct information.

Date21:48:50, December 04, 2005 CET
FromRadical Freedom Party
ToDebating the FP, RSDP, CP backed regulation of Media Content
MessageWe appreciate the point of view of the RSDP but we do not share it. We believe the Rutanian media are adult enough to do without such legislation, and we oppose a 'court culture' where people sue because they saw something offensive when watching the TV.

Date18:06:23, December 05, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Party II
ToDebating the FP, RSDP, CP backed regulation of Media Content
MessageWe agree with the RFP. And better that people are manipulated by the media than by the government.

Date21:40:40, December 05, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Imperialist Party
ToDebating the FP, RSDP, CP backed regulation of Media Content
MessageNah.

Date23:30:14, December 05, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Party II
ToDebating the FP, RSDP, CP backed regulation of Media Content
Message"It is proven fact that media censorship causes herpes and plague." stated McLiberty today in an LAP publication.

Date15:48:58, December 06, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the FP, RSDP, CP backed regulation of Media Content
MessageThe Freedom Party, having reexamined the policy and having listened to the arguments against it, hereby swing their 111 seats to against this motion

(it would pass otherwise)

Date21:49:49, December 06, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the FP, RSDP, CP backed regulation of Media Content
MessageWhat arguments, there are no arguments against it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 193

no
    

Total Seats: 342

abstain
 

Total Seats: 64


Random fact: When your party holds the foreign affairs department, you can create new treaties. However, before writing anything new, it is a good idea to search for existing treaties which already accomplish what you desire.

Random quote: "It would be nice if the poor were to get even half of the money that is spent in studying them." - Bill Vaughan

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 69