We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Aldegar Property Rights Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Aldegar Liberty Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2151
Description[?]:
| "Property must be secured, or liberty cannot exist." This act seeks to restore property rights and liberties to those in Aldegar who are deprived of their property rights for artificial reasons. The first measure seeks to restore choice to owner's of bars and restaurants who currently have no choice. Let the market dictate whether smoking is allowed in bars and restaurants instead of using governmental force to damage the market by ridding the market of a large demographic. The second part of the act calls for an end to the pointless banning of property owners from having gates communities. Unless I'm mistaken we allow apartment buildings to have locked doors with the only method of getting in by key or invite of the apartment patron, we do this to allow people to feel secure. Why should we deny this very same right to those who own propety instead? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning gated communities.
Old value:: No gated communities are allowed.
Current: Both the government and the private sector can set up gated communities.
Proposed: Both the government and the private sector can set up gated communities.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in all places of employment.
Current: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner, and is legal in government-owned buildings.
Proposed: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner, but is illegal in government-owned buildings.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:07:26, December 06, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the Aldegar Property Rights Act |
| Message | We'd prefer to see the proposals here reintroduced as two separate legislation, as we can support only one, but not both. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 217 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 284 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
| Random quote: "If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution." - Emma Goldman |