Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:16:45
Server time: 19:43:14, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Secondary Strike Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Country Labor Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2152

Description[?]:

Unions that are not on strike have a valid contract and should be required to work according to that contract.
They should not be free to walk off the job because another union that has gone on strike asks for it.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:34:15, December 06, 2005 CET
FromUnio Liberál daď Ordio Mordusián
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Act
MessageWe agree.

Date15:48:18, December 06, 2005 CET
FromPlinio's United Followers
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Act
MessageAgree completely

Date00:50:57, December 07, 2005 CET
FromLeft Socialist Party
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Act
MessageCompletely foolish. Secondary strike is a very important way to decide in serious social conflicts

Date16:48:50, December 07, 2005 CET
FromPlinio's United Followers
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Act
MessageSecondary action has no relation with the people that are originaly making the strike. It is often used simply to gain popular power and keep the membership busy.

Date16:54:11, December 07, 2005 CET
FromCountry Labor Party
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Act
MessageWe repeat: unions not on strike have already under contract. That is, they have agreed to work for a salary and other
considerations. The LSP says that that contract is irrelevant, and can be broken any time the workers want.

And strikes are not "social conflicts". They are business transactions between companies and unions.

Date23:19:33, December 07, 2005 CET
FromLeft-Hand Path
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Act
MessageNot all workers are on contract. They have a right to not work, so long as they understand that they won't be paid, either. It's nobody's business why someone doesn't work.

Date23:39:13, December 07, 2005 CET
FromNational Thomasian Party
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Act
Messagebecause union leaders are not democratically accountable to their members a handful of men could force all the workers in the country to down tools through secondary strike action. It is our business to see that a small undemocratic group could hold the nation to ransom for their own gain.

Date00:35:16, December 08, 2005 CET
FromCountry Labor Party
ToDebating the Secondary Strike Act
MessageThe proposal covers only "union workers"; what other workers choose to do is not covered here.
Workers achieve bargaining power by joining together in a union.
The union exists primarily to negotiate the terms of a contract with the company owners.
This contract represents a promise by both sides; neither side should be able to violate it whenever they want to.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 86

no
  

Total Seats: 118

abstain
  

Total Seats: 99


Random fact: Particracy is set in the fictional world of Terra, which mirrors the real world of today and yet is not quite like it.

Random quote: “Tell these old, grey men that their time is over. Tell them to give us back our future, and then get lost!” - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74