Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 00:46:05
Server time: 11:13:54, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): dannypk19 | LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Bill part B 2151

Details

Submitted by[?]: BigBoss Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2153

Description[?]:

This is just a proposal for the military

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:23:56, December 06, 2005 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
MessageThe nation should continue the policy of separation between the civilian police and the military

Date03:47:20, December 07, 2005 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
MessageEver heard of marital law
1)Now currently our police force is weak as hell<no offense jelbania i love you> if you look at the region details
2)when the police force needs assitants in riots or any type of hardcore standing event, who will aid them?

gotta think about these things.

Date04:09:11, December 07, 2005 CET
From Jelbanian Fascist Party
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
MessageWe agree to this whole-heartily.

Date04:34:18, December 07, 2005 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
MessageWe should increasing funding for our police forces then. Blending the military and civilian police paves the ways towards fascism.

Date13:50:31, December 07, 2005 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
Messagewhy do you insist on this blending stuff when all they are doing is helping out with extreme situations.
and we cant increase funding right now <with it actually meaning something>because we are still in beta testing


Date21:18:18, December 07, 2005 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
MessageBut aren't you skeptical of another dictatorship? Shouldn't our military be responsible for solely protecting our borders? I know the bill says "serious emergencies" but I am afraid of that this power will be abused. How long will we be in beta testing?

The Liberal Party will keep an open mind on this issue until the debate is over.


Date01:19:25, December 08, 2005 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
Messageeveryone knows even in other countries that dictatorships piss me off
so please dont put anything i do with a dictator or anything along that road

secondly- all i have to say is trust me when i say there will be no more dictatorships in jelbania. details cannot be put out at the moment in full but dictatorships will not be present again.

=)

Date01:58:33, December 08, 2005 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
MessageIn the name of good governance and cooperation, the Liberal Party will support this bill. (Not that it matters since we have no seats in Parliament!!)

Date04:23:09, December 08, 2005 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
Messagelol
always remeber this
You still have a voice.

Date23:58:49, December 08, 2005 CET
From Centre Démocratique
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
MessageI am curioius as to the Republican Party's reason why they voted against this bill. I would also encourage them to become more active and to vote more frequently.

Date03:19:55, December 09, 2005 CET
From BigBoss Party
ToDebating the Military Bill part B 2151
Messagelet me tell you something about the republican party, they are a bunch of soft goverment, weak military girly men lol

but i gotta accept them because they are jelbanian

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 176

no
  

Total Seats: 119

abstain
    

Total Seats: 174


Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America).

Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62