We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kanjoran Socialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2152
Description[?]:
| Seeing as how the military has more power than police AND seeing as how they are expertly trained We propose the military acting as police. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:19:08, December 06, 2005 CET | From |  Malfico Progressive Fascist Party | To | Debating the Police Act |
| Message | We shall oppose this bill. The millitary are responsible to the government, whereas police forces are primarily responsible to legislation. The millitary must be kept away from law enforcement to prevent the creation of a police state. |
| Date | 15:56:57, December 06, 2005 CET | From | Kanjoran Imperial Party | To | Debating the Police Act |
| Message | we will vote yes |
| Date | 18:53:52, December 06, 2005 CET | From | Populist Liberal Party | To | Debating the Police Act |
| Message | We will oppose, as the name for that is martial law. It is already law (one the PLP proposed and passed) that the military can be called in to help in serious emergencies. Furthermore, police are now armed with guns. We feel that should be sufficient. |
| Date | 04:24:45, December 07, 2005 CET | From | Populist Liberal Party | To | Debating the Police Act |
| Message | I see that this has been altered to a more moderate position, one that we might be able to support. |
| Date | 10:57:28, December 07, 2005 CET | From | Kanjoran Socialist Party | To | Debating the Police Act |
| Message | Malfico, there is nothing wrong with a police state. What is wrong with wanting Kanjor to be more secure? |
| Date | 23:38:10, December 08, 2005 CET | From | Yehudi Aliyah | To | Debating the Police Act |
| Message | A military police!? No! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 282 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 455 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 12 |
| Random fact: If you have a question, post it on the forum. Game Moderators and other players will be happy to help you. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "I took the initiative in creating the internet." - Al Gore |