We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: a
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ducal Delegation
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2152
Description[?]:
| Why are we wasting so much money and resources on maintaining a bureaucracy to pointlessly register who owns which animals? Percy Waterman (Personal Secretary to the Grand Duke of Hikirena) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the ownership of domestic animals as pets.
Old value:: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Current: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding domestic animal ownership.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:30:25, December 06, 2005 CET | From |  Ducal Delegation | To | Debating the a |
| Message | Apologies for the bill title... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 313 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 158 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 30 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "We have to face the fact that either all of us are going to die together or we are going to learn to live together, and if we are to live together we have to talk." - Eleanor Roosevelt |