We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 3369
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Dolgavan Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3370
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Dolgava Confederation Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Traditionalist Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Progressive Green Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Dolgava People's Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Democratic Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the The Dolgavan Conservative Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Liberal Democratic Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Vigs Partija ('Whigs')
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the The Dolgavan Conservative Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Vigs Partija ('Whigs')
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Dolgava Confederation Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Dolgava People's Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Traditionalist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:01:14, September 23, 2012 CET | From | Vigs Partija ('Whigs') | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | I'm happy to support this cabinet proposal |
Date | 20:32:01, September 23, 2012 CET | From | Progressive Green Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | Yes! |
Date | 21:54:15, September 23, 2012 CET | From | Dolgava Confederation Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | We will oppose this. It makes no sense to assign two portfolios to the smallest party, especially such prominent portfolios as Finance and Justice. |
Date | 22:00:31, September 23, 2012 CET | From | Dolgava Confederation Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | We will support any proposal that assigns both Head of Government and Finance to us. If someone manages to figure out a way to continue to include every party in the cabinet, we will gladly support it. However, it seems that a couple parties (primarily the Republicans / Democratic Party / Anonymous -- they keep changing their name, maybe we can call them the Undecided Party from now on?) are determined to oppose any power-sharing proposal. |
Date | 22:22:15, September 23, 2012 CET | From | The Dolgavan Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | I'm sorry Confederation party but the whigs may be the smallest party, you want to assign the parties where they are experienced, you have only just joined but you want 2 prominent roles.. you think that makes sense. |
Date | 22:24:51, September 23, 2012 CET | From | Dolgava Confederation Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | That would be consistent with the will of the people and the fact that our party won the most seats. |
Date | 22:39:07, September 23, 2012 CET | From | The Dolgavan Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | So did the DPP and then they lost it so we still believe in this cabinet |
Date | 22:41:54, September 23, 2012 CET | From | Dolgava Confederation Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | Yes, the DPP did lose their previous status as the largest party, which is why no one is proposing that they form government. |
Date | 08:31:39, September 24, 2012 CET | From | Traditionalist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | This doesn't effect the traditionalist party so we abstain. |
Date | 23:47:36, September 24, 2012 CET | From | Progressive Green Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3369 |
Message | Just in case anybody didn't know, if any party involved in the proposed cabinet votes no or abstains, the bill will fail. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 95 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 164 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 42 |
Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
Random quote: "George W. Bush will protect your unborn fetus, then send your grown child to die in war." - Rick Claro |