We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Adulthood
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Peoples Socialist-Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3373
Description[?]:
| Should be determined by age. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The way adulthood is determined.
Old value:: Adulthood is determined by a test.
Current: Adulthood is determined by age.
Proposed: Adulthood is determined by age.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:15:07, September 29, 2012 CET | From |  Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Adulthood |
| Message | You call yourselves Socialist, but you ignore the diversity in biology, in favour of conservative ideals in determining the level of one's responsibility? We set a test that any citizen can take as soon as they reach 12. They don't have to take it, but if they take it, and they pass, they're allowed to vote. If a citizen hasn't passed the test by the time he/she is 24, he/she may still be considered an adult, but before 24, he/she must take a test. If he/she passes the test, even as early as 12, he/she may be considered an adult and given the right to vote. Thanks for taking democracy away. We expected nothing better from fake Socialists. Kristov III, High Count |
| Date | 22:24:50, September 30, 2012 CET | From | The Peoples Socialist-Democratic Party | To | Debating the Adulthood |
| Message | You say i am powerless yet every other house but yours voted yes. This is change, do not concern yourself with my form of socialism,just with your grip on power slipping |
| Date | 22:41:33, September 30, 2012 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Adulthood |
| Message | You are powerless. It's the other 3 houses that have the power to pass the bill, not you. It doesn't matter to me, anyway. The public will see them as flip-floppers, and since they all share the same stance, their supporters will be split among each other. Let's imagine as low as 36% of the population prefer the current law, and as high as 64% prefer your proposal: - I will have 36% support, based on this bill - The 64% support, for your proposal, will be split among the 4 of you, so you only get 16% each. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 67 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 32 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "I don’t have facts to back this up." - Herman Cain |