Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:57:18
Server time: 20:02:41, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: New Capital City Act (2152)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Front Canrillaise

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2159

Description[?]:

Our party threw the idea of moving the capital before and we will now put it up for debate since the new cities are created.

We have two districts to pick from here:
1.) Tirali: the geographical centre of the nation
2.) Zirdor: the most populous district

I suppose after we have decided on which is the proper district to have our capital in then we can move on to picking a city from the seven candidates (excluding Tirali City):
1.) Tirali: Alkebulan, Malini, Pax Rildanoria
2.) Zirdor: Urb Ex Virgo, Regina Martyrum, Falckstone, Kasern

And a last option:
3.) City of Angels


Whatever we finally agree on is fine with our party, except of course the current capital whose name lacks uniqueness for a capital city. The monarch (the Queen) will also have to pack up and move to the capital as a symbol of the Royal House's support for the new move.


Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:19:23, December 09, 2005 CET
FromUnion for the Rights of Christian Women
ToDebating the New Capital City Act (2152)
MessageWe propose the City of Angels, since its the largest city in Rildanor.

We do not support the ideea that Urb Ex Virgo will be the new capital. The national government is not wanted there.

Date18:17:38, December 13, 2005 CET
From Front Canrillaise
ToDebating the New Capital City Act (2152)
MessageDoes anyone else have any thoughts on this?

Date18:28:35, December 20, 2005 CET
FromProletariat Coalition
ToDebating the New Capital City Act (2152)
MessageI think City of Angels is fine.

Date11:06:26, December 22, 2005 CET
FromUnion for the Rights of Christian Women
ToDebating the New Capital City Act (2152)
MessageI haven't seen so much activity since the Theocracy.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 94

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 6


    Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side).

    Random quote: "You can't give the government the power to do good without also giving it the power to do bad, in fact, to do anything it wants." - Harry Browne

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54