Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 02:59:13
Server time: 13:00:46, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): aai14 | Brazil25 | GLNBei | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 2152

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Dolgaria Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2153

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:17:31, December 09, 2005 CET
FromUnited Dolgaria Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
MessageSame coalition as last time, however adjusted to seat changes. I am still asking for only one place, Defense. I think that all of us will be satisfied with amount and number of places given to them, and because the coalition has won seats as a whole we are even stronger than before. Hurrah Empress Yvette!

Date03:17:07, December 09, 2005 CET
FromDolgarian Imperial Revivalists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
MessageOf course you do realise that you can only form a government with the permission of SDU, or maybe the Republicans....

Date04:32:45, December 09, 2005 CET
FromMovement for White Supremacy
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
Messagethe republicans are not republican. They are "republic"-an in name with the same commie ideology as the DNCP

Date04:33:50, December 09, 2005 CET
FromMovement for White Supremacy
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
MessageI really would not mind being Foreign secretary. However, the LPP seems to be the only party that every coalition here (except for CU/RPD) can relate to.

Date12:52:11, December 09, 2005 CET
FromUnited Dolgaria Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
MessageAren't you happy with Justice and Finance (which are two very important ministries) plus Infrastructure (important) and Trade/Industry (moderately important)? I hope SDU will accept it.

Date16:04:51, December 09, 2005 CET
FromLiberty and Prosperity Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
MessageThis leaves SDU out of one of the important 5 offices. So, sorry, I cannot agree to it. I prefer SDU to have Internal Affairs.

Date17:43:59, December 09, 2005 CET
FromUnited Dolgaria Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
MessageIf you're fine with giving Internal Office to SDU I'll add a similar proposal with SDU having Internal.

Date17:45:40, December 09, 2005 CET
FromSocio-Democratic Union
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
MessageI'm leaning toward LPP's point of view on that. I'd be eager to support a "broad-coalition" cabinet, if that help keeping status quo on various social/economical issue I believe to be important.

And, that cabinet shouldn't be call a conservative one, I'm inside of it :p

Date19:19:24, December 09, 2005 CET
FromMovement for White Supremacy
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
MessageFirstly, I agree with all of the points, especialy the ones about SDU.
However,
Lets be quite honest guys.
These cabinet posts dont mean shiiza. The only two posts that actually mean something are Foreign Sec and Head of Govt. The rest are merely titles that do not have any responsibilities attached. Granted, SDU should have a choice in what posts he wants. But it really doesnt mean anything.

I say we either say "yes" to this one or keep the old one. either way, we should keep this coalition for the next few election cycles.

Date19:20:22, December 09, 2005 CET
FromMovement for White Supremacy
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
MessageTo sum up my point, did anyone see my environment/tourism secretary!?!?
does it look like I care, or have any responsibilities for that post?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 176

no
  

Total Seats: 176

abstain
    

Total Seats: 398


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to prevent confusion by ensuring unofficial or outdated bills labelled as "Cultural Protocols" are removed from their nation page.

Random quote: "The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites.'" - Larry Hardiman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66