We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 2152
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Dolgaria Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2153
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Socio-Democratic Union
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Movement for White Supremacy
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Movement for White Supremacy
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the United Dolgaria Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Movement for White Supremacy
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Movement for White Supremacy
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Socio-Democratic Union
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Socio-Democratic Union
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:17:31, December 09, 2005 CET | From | United Dolgaria Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | Same coalition as last time, however adjusted to seat changes. I am still asking for only one place, Defense. I think that all of us will be satisfied with amount and number of places given to them, and because the coalition has won seats as a whole we are even stronger than before. Hurrah Empress Yvette! |
| Date | 03:17:07, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | Of course you do realise that you can only form a government with the permission of SDU, or maybe the Republicans.... |
| Date | 04:32:45, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | the republicans are not republican. They are "republic"-an in name with the same commie ideology as the DNCP |
| Date | 04:33:50, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | I really would not mind being Foreign secretary. However, the LPP seems to be the only party that every coalition here (except for CU/RPD) can relate to. |
| Date | 12:52:11, December 09, 2005 CET | From | United Dolgaria Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | Aren't you happy with Justice and Finance (which are two very important ministries) plus Infrastructure (important) and Trade/Industry (moderately important)? I hope SDU will accept it. |
| Date | 16:04:51, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Liberty and Prosperity Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | This leaves SDU out of one of the important 5 offices. So, sorry, I cannot agree to it. I prefer SDU to have Internal Affairs. |
| Date | 17:43:59, December 09, 2005 CET | From | United Dolgaria Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | If you're fine with giving Internal Office to SDU I'll add a similar proposal with SDU having Internal. |
| Date | 17:45:40, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Socio-Democratic Union | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | I'm leaning toward LPP's point of view on that. I'd be eager to support a "broad-coalition" cabinet, if that help keeping status quo on various social/economical issue I believe to be important. And, that cabinet shouldn't be call a conservative one, I'm inside of it :p |
| Date | 19:19:24, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | Firstly, I agree with all of the points, especialy the ones about SDU. However, Lets be quite honest guys. These cabinet posts dont mean shiiza. The only two posts that actually mean something are Foreign Sec and Head of Govt. The rest are merely titles that do not have any responsibilities attached. Granted, SDU should have a choice in what posts he wants. But it really doesnt mean anything. I say we either say "yes" to this one or keep the old one. either way, we should keep this coalition for the next few election cycles. |
| Date | 19:20:22, December 09, 2005 CET | From | Movement for White Supremacy | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2152 |
| Message | To sum up my point, did anyone see my environment/tourism secretary!?!? does it look like I care, or have any responsibilities for that post? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 176 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 176 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 398 |
| Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
| Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller |