We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Paramilitary support
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Worker's Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3386
Description[?]:
| A proposal to strengthen our military |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government's position on paramilitaries.
Old value:: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Current: Paramilitaries are illegal and the recognized government may intervene freely to stop any possible activity.
Proposed: Paramilitaries are allowed as part of each political party.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:25:19, October 24, 2012 CET | From | Conservative Party Of Kazulia | To | Debating the Paramilitary support |
| Message | The party is sorry, but we can not support this bill, We agree with Article 1, But not with 2, We do not need paramilitaries really, its politics, Not war. ~Party Leader Kruskopf |
| Date | 23:31:41, October 24, 2012 CET | From | Liberal Konservative Partiet | To | Debating the Paramilitary support |
| Message | I oppose this on both articles. There should be a clear separation of the Police and the military, and Paramilitaries are not the answer to our differences. Healthy debate is the clear answer, then we can peacefully compromise and work together for our people. Lord High Chancellor of His Imperial Majesty's Privy Council Lord Røros |
| Date | 01:27:30, October 25, 2012 CET | From | Kazulian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Paramilitary support |
| Message | [The Right Honorable Richard Hawethorne] The KAC is strongly opposed to this act of legislation. It is anti-individual, and presents the threat of undermining civilian rights. The supposed 'Workers Party' should rethink it's outlook. |
| Date | 07:06:04, October 25, 2012 CET | From | Centre Party | To | Debating the Paramilitary support |
| Message | We agree with article 2 but strongly disagree with article 1, so we must vote against. |
| Date | 13:16:12, October 25, 2012 CET | From | Union Worker's Party | To | Debating the Paramilitary support |
| Message | Hurts rights? I dont understand KAC, I just support having the military back up police incase major disasters and such, And for the paramilitary, It is a right, maybe i can make it regulated by the government, but paramilitaries have been a factor of government since your ancestors were even thought of. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 131 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
| Random quote: "We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children." - Native American proverb |