Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5470
Next month in: 00:15:59
Server time: 19:44:00, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): catpotatoz | hexaus19 | hnp19 | luthorian3059 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 3385

Details

Submitted by[?]: Mugenkai

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3386

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:23:19, October 26, 2012 CET
FromMugenkai
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 3385
MessageWe thank the voters for their clear endorsement of the Mugenkai's progressive ideals. It is time to heal the wounds of dictatorship and move forward into true self-rule. Let the guiding lights of our government be the faith in justice, the love of truth, and the hope for a better tomorrow! As we joyfully embrace the traditions from which we were for too long parted, let us also embrace the willingness to create new culture and new traditions. The future without limit belongs to the people of Sekowo henceforth!

-Mitsuru Kirijo, Shushō-designate, at an open session of the Kokkai

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 700

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

      Random quote: "The payment of taxes gives a right to protection." - James M. Wayne

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 42