We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Peoples Revolutionary Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2156
Description[?]:
| This will ensure that all schools are public and free to the people of Hutori and would eliminate the vial pratice of private schools which only benifit the rich and wealthy while leaving out everyday people. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The education system.
Old value:: There is a free public education system and a small number of private schools, which are heavily regulated to ensure they teach adequate skills and information.
Current: Education is a matter of local governments.
Proposed: Education is entirely public and free; private schools are banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:33:27, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Although we have a different agenda for this idea, the Authoritarian Party supports banning private schools. Public school is critical in the role of promoting obedience and respect for the State. We cannot allow treasonous ideas to be shoved into the heads of citizens at private schools. |
| Date | 03:44:49, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | I just dont want these schools to think they have more rights then the public ones. |
| Date | 05:05:53, December 10, 2005 CET | From |  First Socialist Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | No, but we should give them a choice, just make sure that there is prohibitive regulation! |
| Date | 21:16:31, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Private schools only create biasness and a form of sub culture, a division between poor and rich...a line that should not be there. |
| Date | 22:14:52, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Against! But we are sure the Communists are not surprised! Why are you so afraid of choice? Also there will always be rich and poor that is the way of Terra and has been since manking climbed out of the trees. How a person spends their own money is up to them. All this will achieve will be those who can afford private education will pay teachers to educate their children in the privacy of their own homes rather than in a school. So what will you do about that? Ban education anywhere but in school? And how would you then define education! This proposal is just not realistic and unenforceable. |
| Date | 22:15:15, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Against! But we are sure the Communists are not surprised! Why are you so afraid of choice? Also there will always be rich and poor that is the way of Terra and has been since manking climbed out of the trees. How a person spends their own money is up to them. All this will achieve will be those who can afford private education will pay teachers to educate their children in the privacy of their own homes rather than in a school. So what will you do about that? Ban education anywhere but in school? And how would you then define education! This proposal is just not realistic and unenforceable. |
| Date | 22:15:24, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Against! But we are sure the Communists are not surprised! Why are you so afraid of choice? Also there will always be rich and poor that is the way of Terra and has been since manking climbed out of the trees. How a person spends their own money is up to them. All this will achieve will be those who can afford private education will pay teachers to educate their children in the privacy of their own homes rather than in a school. So what will you do about that? Ban education anywhere but in school? And how would you then define education! This proposal is just not realistic and unenforceable. |
| Date | 22:17:26, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Our apologies for the multi post! |
| Date | 22:34:03, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Choice? Do you think people choose to be poor? Sure the rich can say they choose to be rich but if you were to ask them how they made there fortune they would say hard work...then the question would be Who's hard work? |
| Date | 22:39:05, December 10, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | YOu have not answered any of the questions we raised. |
| Date | 18:30:19, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | The answer you seek is for me to say that Rich people deserve more choices then Poor people...well that is not the answer you will get, you will get that Education should be free and for all people and therefore the need for private schools are nonexsistent. |
| Date | 21:01:00, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Even if the need was to be made non-existant, (and this will not achieve that by the way), those with the resources can, and likely will, still get private education. It is just that it will be carried out in their own home rather than in a large building with "SCHOOL" written on the front! |
| Date | 23:29:13, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Well in that case they can fund there own teaching and they wont recieve any help from the government. |
| Date | 23:08:40, December 12, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | Therefore you are defacto allowing private education. Private education by definition gets no funding from government nor has it ever sought such. |
| Date | 04:57:13, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Peoples Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | or we can make it mandatory that they got to public school, seeings it is free and all. |
| Date | 21:04:56, December 14, 2005 CET | From | Confucianist Party | To | Debating the Nationalized Schools for Hutori Act (NSHA) |
| Message | We totally agree to this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 89 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 144 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation. |
| Random quote: "When I see a 9/11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, "Oh shut up" I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining." - Glenn Beck |