Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:01:49
Server time: 19:58:10, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Rights of the Accused Act 3406

Details

Submitted by[?]: Five Regions Liberation Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3407

Description[?]:

An Act to protect the rights of those who have been accused of crimes without conviction

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:14:38, December 06, 2012 CET
FromFive Regions Liberation Alliance
ToDebating the Rights of the Accused Act 3406
MessageThe New Alliance supports the maintenance a database of DNA of those who have been convicted; however, we feel it is a blatant violation of the civil rights of the accused to hold their DNA after they have been acquitted of wrong doing.

Date07:01:19, December 06, 2012 CET
FromMinimalist Party
ToDebating the Rights of the Accused Act 3406
MessageHow could recording the DNA of citizens be a violation of civil rights?

At this point, we do not feel strongly for or against this change.

Date06:22:54, December 07, 2012 CET
FromSocialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK)
ToDebating the Rights of the Accused Act 3406
MessageWe can support the change.

Date19:09:12, December 07, 2012 CET
FromMinimalist Party
ToDebating the Rights of the Accused Act 3406
MessageWe do not understand why recording the DNA of the accused would be a violation of their civil rights, but we don't want to take the chance. We support, reluctantly.

Date20:47:48, December 07, 2012 CET
FromFive Regions Liberation Alliance
ToDebating the Rights of the Accused Act 3406
MessageWe are fearful of the message that it sends to our citizens. We fear that it says those who are wrongly accused of crimes that they are forever suspect in the eyes of the state.

Date22:24:00, December 07, 2012 CET
FromPeople's Socialist Party
ToDebating the Rights of the Accused Act 3406
MessageWe agree with the New Alliance' position on this matter, therefore we support this Act.

Date23:04:35, December 07, 2012 CET
FromMinimalist Party
ToDebating the Rights of the Accused Act 3406
MessageThat makes sense. The actual recording of the DNA isn't an infringement on their rights, but the message it sends could be interpreted as an infringement. Thank you for your explanation. We can now say that we support in confidence.

Date00:17:50, December 08, 2012 CET
FromCrimson Lance Directive
ToDebating the Rights of the Accused Act 3406
MessageWe are somewhat impartial to this bill.

Date17:43:11, December 08, 2012 CET
FromFive Regions Liberation Alliance
ToDebating the Rights of the Accused Act 3406
MessageThe thank the SPoK, Minimalists, CLD, and the PSP for their support.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 612

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 138


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed." - Mahatma Gandhi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 70