Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:22:00
Server time: 06:37:59, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): blowingnorthwind | Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of June 3409

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Freedom Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3410

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:35:41, December 12, 2012 CET
FromRutania Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3409
MessageMr. Speaker,

We feel that this cabinet does meet our standards of an open and independent cabinet that unifies the parties and we will therefore vote in favor of this proposal.

Richard Wilcox
RRP Chairman

Date05:42:41, December 12, 2012 CET
FromRutanian Federal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3409
MessageMr. Speaker,

No way.

Otto van Helsing
President, Rutanian Federal Party

Date05:57:50, December 12, 2012 CET
FromMinarchist League of Rutania
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3409
MessageMr. Speaker,

We believe this to be an excellent proposal that represents the parties fairly. We are looking forward to vote for this bill.

Walter Parrot
Chairman, Rutanian Liberty Party

Date08:40:59, December 12, 2012 CET
FromLibertarian Freedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3409
MessageMr. Speaker,

Why does the RFP disagree?

Chandra Myhre,
LFP Leader

Date12:28:33, December 12, 2012 CET
FromRutanian Federal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3409
MessageMr. Speaker,

Aside from the fact that Federal has next to nothing to do, this is a blatant two-finger salute to our voters. They elected a RRP-RFP coalition, which due to the aggressive nature of the LFP and the UPR, has had its hand tied behind its back somewhat. This suggestion renders elections pointless. If everyone's in government anyway, what's the point of choosing one every four years?

Otto van Helsing
President, Rutanian Federal Party

Date18:29:04, December 12, 2012 CET
FromUrban Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3409
MessageMr. Speaker,

We agree with the comments of the RFP in regards to the government. We had no idea the "everybody gets a trophy" mentality had invaded Rutanian politics. We will be voting against this cabinet as well and instead support one based on a LFP-UPR-RLP coalition.

However, I would like to thank the RRP for ensuring the aformentioned coalition is possible. Without there vote for "End the Shutdown (Version 2)", this coalition would not be possible at all.

Mariana Jiménez
UPR Congressional Leader

Date23:55:44, December 12, 2012 CET
FromRutania Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of June 3409
MessageMr. Speaker,

The RRP despite earlier agreement to vote, must restrain at this time from the vote. We will be maintaining a Abstain vote due to a split vote within the party over this issue.

Despite this the RRP would like to state the following: Despite our differences between all the parties due to the past few years of constant strife and turmoil we had hoped to see an overwhelming support for this government in order to create a sense of peace. We believe that all parties bring something unique to our Government and that through a Moderate approach that we can find a middle ground that would assist our nation and our people.

However, We have yet to find such middle ground, but the RRP is hoping soon we will have it.

Richard Wilcox
RRP Chairman

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 141

no
  

Total Seats: 269

abstain
   

Total Seats: 189


Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America).

Random quote: "The radical of one century is the conservative of the next. The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them." - Mark Twain

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63