We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pension Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Workers Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2154
Description[?]:
| 70 years old? Gimme a break. The old timers built this nation with their sweat and blood. They deserve to kick back and enjoy their golden years. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 70
Current: 72
Proposed: 60
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:03:10, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Society of Sadists | To | Debating the Pension Reform |
| Message | No way Jose! |
| Date | 04:56:23, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Alliance 44 | To | Debating the Pension Reform |
| Message | looking at the age structure of our society, we support |
| Date | 20:30:21, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Primus Inter Pares | To | Debating the Pension Reform |
| Message | I don't understand the bill Is 70 the age in which we have to retire or is it the minimum age. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 43 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 49 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 8 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all." - Maximilien Robespierre |