Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5476
Next month in: 00:21:28
Server time: 15:38:31, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): NL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Reform of Defense Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Plaid Genedlaethol Rhyddfrydol

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 3417

Description[?]:

We have find issues with this country's defense policies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:33:48, December 26, 2012 CET
FromPopular Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageWe commend the PGR for proposing such a forward-thinking bill. It will have the full support of the Popular Party.

Richard Anderson
Popular Party Defence Spokesman

Date00:51:43, December 26, 2012 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageMr. Speaker, my party also commends the PGR for proposing this civilised and progressive reform of our defence policy. We would like to go further still by eliminating Dranland's connections to all weapons of mass destruction programs.

George Butterworth MP
(Leader of the DSP)

Date01:29:16, December 26, 2012 CET
FromPlaid Genedlaethol Rhyddfrydol
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageMr. Speaker, We had added a additional proposal to the bill, regulating chemical and biological weapons. This proposal will allow us to research the technology in order to develop counters to these weapons. We understand the DSP wants to go farther, and ban WMD, but we believe having the ability to reply to a nuclear attack is important, which why we stated that weapons will be used only in response to a nuclear strike on our country.

Sieffre Sayer
President of PGR

Date01:48:12, December 26, 2012 CET
FromPlaid Genedlaethol Rhyddfrydol
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageMr. Speaker, we have edited the proposal and put a policy similar to the biological and chemical policies after discussing with other party members, we had decided that a different policy might be made in regards to self-defense.

Sieffre Sayer
President of PGR

Date21:49:29, December 26, 2012 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageClearly this self-mortification is the wrong message after we have gone through two events that threatened our national security in the last decades, including the Valruzia crisis and the imperialistic aspirations of the now-defeated KSP regime. Even though both times peaceful solutions prevailed, there is simply no guarantee that this will happen a third time. We must stay strong, not hand potential enemies our national assets over on a silver plate.

Geoffrey Fox MP
Member for Elbian
Minister of Defence

Date22:22:39, December 26, 2012 CET
FromCivic Democratic Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageMr. Speaker,
Is it not the right of our nation to defend itself in a way that it sees fit? If our military deems it unnecessary to lay land mines and operate the other weapons above mentioned, then it will not do so. Otherwise, politicians should remain out of how our nation is defended - and leave the policy up to our publicly appointed military officials.
I yield.

Alexander Cordova, MP
Member for Ponte Iglesias South
Chairman of Encrucijada Demócratica

Date23:44:07, December 26, 2012 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageMr Speaker,

I contact the heads of our armed forces daily for military briefing to make sure their input is taken into account in all military-related decisions, however I must reject the approach of Mr Cordova because the army is a branch of the state and must thus be subjected to political decision-making, everything else would be immensely dangerous.


Geoffrey Fox MP
Member for Elbian
Minister of Defence

Date23:59:52, December 26, 2012 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageMr. Speaker, the passing of this bill would represent a great step towards Dranland dealing with the rest of Terra in a more civilised and humane way.

George Butterworth MP
(Leader of the DSP)

Date00:54:19, December 27, 2012 CET
FromCivic Democratic Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageMr. Speaker,
When I stated my support for leaving politics out of our military decision making I didn't intend to imply that our military be left to its own devices. Quite the opposite, I feel that we should allow for the use of land mines (etc.), and let our military decide whether to use it or not. I don't feel it prudent to deprive our military of options when defending our nation because of some politician's "morals".
I yield.

Alexander Cordova, MP
Member for Ponte Iglesias South
Chairman of Encrucijada Demócratica

Date01:02:21, December 27, 2012 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageMr. Speaker, If our civilian political leaders do not apply morality to the conduct of war, then we cannot reasonably rely on the generals and soldiers beneath them to do so.

George Butterworth MP
(Leader of the DSP)

Date01:03:02, December 27, 2012 CET
FromDrania Cívica 🏴 시민당
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We commend the PGR for its move to eliminate biological and chemical weapons, however we unfortunately will not support this bill due to its restrictions on nuclear weaponry. As long as the world is populated by nuclear-armed totalitarian dictatorships, we must have an ability to pursue nuclear development for the sake of discouraging global madmen from using their WMDs against us.

Seong Park
Member for Magadonia
Virtuous Kyo Alliance

Date18:26:55, December 27, 2012 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageOOC: C'mon, PAC - log in and help us peaceniks out here!

Date18:57:00, December 27, 2012 CET
FromValdorian Blue Shirt Movement
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageDespicable.

Javier Rabal, MP
Jefe Adjunto de Partido

Date19:19:54, December 27, 2012 CET
FromDrania Cívica 🏴 시민당
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageOOC: Interesting...I wonder how the game mechanics handle a tied vote. I'm guessing it'll be defeated. ???

Date21:39:49, December 27, 2012 CET
FromCivic Democratic Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageOOC: Yes. This happened once to me over in Hutori...

Date00:21:00, December 28, 2012 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Reform of Defense Act
MessageOOC: Yeah, as it says near the top of the bill - "This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline."

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 123

no
    

Total Seats: 123

abstain
 

Total Seats: 4


Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

Random quote: Wait a min was we tricked into voting for absolute monarchy (Jamie Jamesson, Chancellor of Luthori 4269-4310)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 102