We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: legality of divorces bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2155
Description[?]:
We currently have a very archaic view on not allowing people to get divorced. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Only divorces that comply with religious doctrine are legal.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:25:42, December 11, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Malivian Party | To | Debating the legality of divorces bill |
Message | Support we guess. |
Date | 00:05:36, December 12, 2005 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the legality of divorces bill |
Message | Support |
Date | 22:30:57, December 12, 2005 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the legality of divorces bill |
Message | You marry, you are stuck with it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 387 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 65 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 47 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "If God made man they say Sam Colt made them equal." - Unknown |