We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3424
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2182">Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. By ratifying this treaty we will pressure on both sides to return to the negotiation table and find a peaceful compromise. http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2182 for more details. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:44:58, January 07, 2013 CET | From | Party of Jakanian Union and Progress | To | Debating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi |
Message | We support but we urge the CAT part to draft a treaty that states our Sultan's claim to the title caliph. Mordusia awaits: Abdullah Al'akim Amun Amabassador to Mordusia Unfortunately our party was defeated in the last papal election and we no longer control our minstry of foreign relations. However, I'm sure we will be back in power soon and would be glad to take a look at this treaty. What is the name of the treaty? I can not find it on the list of treaties. Sincerely, Alabama Moranis Chairman Conquest Party |
Date | 05:05:22, January 09, 2013 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi |
Message | Greeting, We hope that Jakania will recognize Pontesi's right to exist as a sovereign and independent state. We have neither committed genocide or conduct any segregation policy between the minority population that travel to Pontesi during Crusader occupation and the majority Pntek population that have suffered during their reign. This treaty signify and support Selucian occupation of our land and as such should not be supported. Best Regards, Mrs. Jennifer Spencer Foreign Affairs Minister Pntek Wrntunyfkai Jezknstat |
Date | 18:21:15, January 09, 2013 CET | From | LP | To | Debating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi |
Message | Dear ladies and gentelmen, this treaty is not about Pontesi our a state. This treaty is about freedom for a minority. A minority which wants to live under the fair rule of law with the same rights as Selucians in Selucia without having to live in constant fear of persecution. We are asking the noble and blessed legislators of Jakania to sign the treaty to finally give the Selucians in Pontesi what everyone deserves: freedom and a fearless live. Karl Meier, general secetary of the KLP |
Date | 03:03:37, January 10, 2013 CET | From | People's Communist Party of Jakania | To | Debating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi |
Message | Jakanians should keep to ourselves and not get involved in affairs that don't concern us. |
Date | 06:23:57, January 10, 2013 CET | From | Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi |
Message | Dear Jakania, It is with great interest that we would like to point to article 3 of this treaty that indicates that signatory will recognize Union of Imperial Crusader Kingdoms, also known as the Selucian Puppet, as the sole representatives of Pontesi. This treaty main interest is to recognize Selucian control over Pontesi. The rest is a lies to support the claim. We would also like to point out that Selucia have provided no evidences to support their claim that the current government of Pontesi have in anyway abuse or disallow freedom to any minority group rather then our refusal to give preferential status to one specific minority. Our current law can be reviewed here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewvariables.php?nationid=50 We would be more then happy to answer any further question you may have. Statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Pntek Wrntunyfkai Jezknstat |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |
no | Total Seats: 0 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 75 |
Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
Random quote: "Bigotry is the disease of ignorance, of morbid minds; enthusiasm of the free and buoyant. Education and free discussion are the antidotes of both." - Thomas Jefferson |