Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 00:45:19
Server time: 19:14:40, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): luthorian3059 | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Republican Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3424

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2182">Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

By ratifying this treaty we will pressure on both sides to return to the negotiation table and find a peaceful compromise. http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=2182 for more details.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:44:58, January 07, 2013 CET
FromParty of Jakanian Union and Progress
ToDebating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi
MessageWe support but we urge the CAT part to draft a treaty that states our Sultan's claim to the title caliph.

Mordusia awaits:



Abdullah Al'akim Amun
Amabassador to Mordusia

Unfortunately our party was defeated in the last papal election and we no longer control our minstry of foreign relations. However, I'm sure we will be back in power soon and would be glad to take a look at this treaty. What is the name of the treaty? I can not find it on the list of treaties.

Sincerely,
Alabama Moranis
Chairman
Conquest Party

Date05:05:22, January 09, 2013 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi
MessageGreeting,

We hope that Jakania will recognize Pontesi's right to exist as a sovereign and independent state. We have neither committed genocide or conduct any segregation policy between the minority population that travel to Pontesi during Crusader occupation and the majority Pntek population that have suffered during their reign. This treaty signify and support Selucian occupation of our land and as such should not be supported.

Best Regards,
Mrs. Jennifer Spencer
Foreign Affairs Minister
Pntek Wrntunyfkai Jezknstat

Date18:21:15, January 09, 2013 CET
FromLP
ToDebating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi
MessageDear ladies and gentelmen,

this treaty is not about Pontesi our a state. This treaty is about freedom for a minority. A minority which wants to live under the fair rule of law with the same rights as Selucians in Selucia without having to live in constant fear of persecution.
We are asking the noble and blessed legislators of Jakania to sign the treaty to finally give the Selucians in Pontesi what everyone deserves:
freedom and a fearless live.

Karl Meier, general secetary of the KLP

Date03:03:37, January 10, 2013 CET
FromPeople's Communist Party of Jakania
ToDebating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi
MessageJakanians should keep to ourselves and not get involved in affairs that don't concern us.

Date06:23:57, January 10, 2013 CET
From Nrzi Prta (Democratic Party)
ToDebating the Ratification of the Committee for the Liberation of the Peoples of Pontesi
MessageDear Jakania,

It is with great interest that we would like to point to article 3 of this treaty that indicates that signatory will recognize Union of Imperial Crusader Kingdoms, also known as the Selucian Puppet, as the sole representatives of Pontesi. This treaty main interest is to recognize Selucian control over Pontesi. The rest is a lies to support the claim.

We would also like to point out that Selucia have provided no evidences to support their claim that the current government of Pontesi have in anyway abuse or disallow freedom to any minority group rather then our refusal to give preferential status to one specific minority. Our current law can be reviewed here: http://classic.particracy.net/viewvariables.php?nationid=50

We would be more then happy to answer any further question you may have.

Statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Pntek Wrntunyfkai Jezknstat

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
 

Total Seats: 75


Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved.

Random quote: "Bigotry is the disease of ignorance, of morbid minds; enthusiasm of the free and buoyant. Education and free discussion are the antidotes of both." - Thomas Jefferson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56