We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: divorce
Details
Submitted by[?]: Seosavists Republican party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2156
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Only divorces that comply with religious doctrine are legal.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the initiation of divorces (if allowed).
Old value:: Local governments decide who can initiate a divorce.
Current: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Proposed: Either partner may initiate a divorce.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:48:07, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | Yes. |
Date | 09:15:22, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | No. This facility makes a mockery of the marriage vows, taken in the presence of God. |
Date | 13:59:08, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | Sure. Also, not ALL marriages are taken in the presence of God. Ever hear of Civili Marriages? They aren't just for gay peoples, y'know! |
Date | 14:00:06, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | *civil |
Date | 14:03:17, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | I don't recognise "registered civil partnerships" as marriages at all. Only the ancient estate of Holy Matrimony should be called 'marriage'. |
Date | 14:41:22, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Seosavists Republican party | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | It is up to the religion it's self to decide if they recognise the divorces(and thus not let them be remarried to other people), but for legal things and religions that it would be applied. |
Date | 17:17:13, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | What Seosavists says. |
Date | 17:19:51, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | Ditto. |
Date | 17:30:51, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | We are the HOLY Luthori Empire. We can't legalise divorce! |
Date | 18:35:08, December 13, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | Then call it annullment. |
Date | 18:43:55, December 14, 2005 CET | From | Seosavists Republican party | To | Debating the divorce |
Message | *religions that allow it Is what I meant now to vote. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 304 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 369 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 77 |
Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
Random quote: "If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates." - Jay Leno |