Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 00:58:17
Server time: 03:01:42, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Competition in Communications Act, amended

Details

Submitted by[?]: Radical Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2157

Description[?]:

Our telephone and post office monopolies have resulted in inefficiency, pathetic coverage, and a very low standard of service. We propose to solve this problem by introducing competition.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:54:06, December 15, 2005 CET
FromInrala Panjoregu Kiokutou (DPP)
ToDebating the Competition in Communications Act, amended
MessageWe will support this bill.

Date10:03:03, December 15, 2005 CET
FromInrala no Ikolowagitou (Green)
ToDebating the Competition in Communications Act, amended
MessageRegulation of private postal services is necessary, otherwise they will serve the cities and neglect the rural areas.

If you could amend article 2 to that effect, then we would support.

Date00:29:34, December 16, 2005 CET
FromPopulist Islamic Workers' League
ToDebating the Competition in Communications Act, amended
MessageNo. We have provided free telephone lines to Indralans for decades; we see no reason to take this away from our people. Secondly, we support public ownership and so we are opposed to all privatisation.

Date03:58:35, December 16, 2005 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the Competition in Communications Act, amended
MessageTo the Green Party's objection - wouldn't the rural areas have the option of using the nationalised post office?

Date15:31:09, December 16, 2005 CET
FromInrala no Ikolowagitou (Green)
ToDebating the Competition in Communications Act, amended
MessageThe national post office, then, would become marginalised as the only provider on the less profitable routes. By all means allow competition, but the rival offices must offer a full service.


Date15:53:26, December 16, 2005 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the Competition in Communications Act, amended
MessageIsn't that the current situation anyway? The national post office receives tax money to support service on unprofitable routes. Its private competitors will not.

Date04:04:38, December 17, 2005 CET
FromInrala no Ikolowagitou (Green)
ToDebating the Competition in Communications Act, amended
MessageNo, the Post office is currently self-funding. The users of the service in all locations pay the cost of providing a comprehensive network. Moving to a tax-based model would shift some of that cost onto non-users of the service which we would consider to be unfair.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 112

no
  

Total Seats: 163

abstain
  

Total Seats: 25


Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242

Random quote: "Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?" - Ernest Gaines

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68