Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5504
Next month in: 00:25:23
Server time: 07:34:36, June 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Agriculture Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Popular Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3450

Description[?]:

The state should not have a role in what citizens can and cannot grow on their private land. We should allow farmers the freedom to control their own crops.

Melissa Hargreaves MP
PP Leader

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:15:18, March 04, 2013 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Agriculture Bill
MessageMadam Speaker,

we are not particularly enthusiastic about article 3. There should be uniform standards across the country in order to guarantee quality and transparency, yet this is a minor objection. Altogether, we believe that opening agribusiness for the free market will greatly benefit productivity and bring down the cost of food through more competition and less distorting subsidies.

Brian McIntosh MP
Member for Loren
GNP Agriculture Spokesman

Date23:32:49, March 04, 2013 CET
FromGukmindang
ToDebating the Agriculture Bill
MessageMadam Speaker, rural communities need protection from the incursions of massive corporations which ride roughshod over their way of life. We are also concerned about the proposal to water down regulations which are vital for maintaining food safety.

Haneul Han
General Secretary of the Gukmindang

Date23:37:27, March 04, 2013 CET
FromGrand National Party
ToDebating the Agriculture Bill
MessageMadam Speaker, rural communities will be able to protect their way of live in a self-determined way by choosing to buy local products if they really wish to do maintain it. Simply calling for government subsidies to protect something that one would otherwise not actively support is surely a questionable stance.

Brian McIntosh MP
Member for Loren
GNP Agriculture Spokesman

Date23:54:23, March 04, 2013 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Agriculture Bill
MessageMadam Speaker,

Three words: No, no, no.

Loke Stenbeck,
Werin Da spokesperson on matters of agriculture

Date10:20:32, March 07, 2013 CET
FromPopular Action Party 인기있는 행동
ToDebating the Agriculture Bill
MessageMadam Speaker,

Once again, another Hargreaves neoliberal mess bites the dust

Mina Mathers
LOL Co-Chair

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 333

no
      

Total Seats: 366

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

    Random quote: "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people and neither do we." - George W. Bush

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71