We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland
Details
Submitted by[?]: Popular Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3451
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:16:06, March 06, 2013 CET | From | Popular Action Party 인기있는 행동 | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland |
Message | Madam Speaker, This Treaty has free trade provisions and open border provisions which are a no-no to us in it and thus we will vote to reject it. Rosie Liech LOL Finance Critic |
Date | 21:33:12, March 06, 2013 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland |
Message | Madame Speaker, Apart from violating our national sovereignty by free trade provisions, we are otherwise against signing any treaty of friendship with Cildania. Cildania is a rouge state, shown by their allegiance to Luthori and their actions against the heroic crusaders of Selucian Pontesium. We who wish Dranland to stand for democracy and human rights strongly condemn this treaty. Tremaine Malcolm, Werin Da spokesperson on human rights |
Date | 23:21:07, March 06, 2013 CET | From | Gukmindang | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland |
Message | OOC: Can you educate me a bit about the Cildania/Selucian Pontesian/Luthori situation? |
Date | 02:16:40, March 07, 2013 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland |
Message | OOC: Cildania, or at least the CNC, is strongly royalist (IML) and has sent it's paramillitaries to support the Belknap Dynasty of Pontesi during every single conflict with Selucia (even when the Belknaps were inactive). Luthori are the unofficial masters of the IML (although both alliances are more or less dead now). |
Date | 02:22:21, March 07, 2013 CET | From | Gukmindang | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland |
Message | OOC: How recently did Cildania last militarily intervene in Pontesi? And how provoked or justified was it? |
Date | 02:48:54, March 07, 2013 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland |
Message | OOC:I think it was some months ago. I'll look it up tomorrow. |
Date | 17:23:11, March 07, 2013 CET | From | Partit Qawmien Soċjalista Maġatrani | To | Debating the Ratification of the Fellowship Treaty of Cildania and Dranland |
Message | OOC: The days of Luthori being masters of the IML are long since past. I am one of the five leaders of the IML. The Government of Cildania has never deployed the military to intervene in a conflict between Pontesi and Selucia. Even during my single party state, I did not deploy the military. Cildania is currently and for the foreseeable future neither a member of the IML nor the ATR. My paramilitary has only ever been deployed to Pontesi to defend it's sovereignty; I have never taken offensive action against Selucia. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 431 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 268 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37 |
Random quote: "Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity." - Albert Einstein |