Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 02:47:59
Server time: 01:12:00, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): dnobb | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Liberalization of the media

Details

Submitted by[?]: League of Justice

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3459

Description[?]:

To ensure the freedom of speech and freedom to television companies, we propose this bill.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:59:29, March 22, 2013 CET
FromDe venstregrønne
ToDebating the Liberalization of the media
MessageA government-funded channel has nothing to do with restricting freedom of speech but rather is about ensuring that at least some high quality, intellectual and educational programming is produced. If everything is left up to the free market the quality of programming is likely to diminish. We are also strongly opposed to allowing hardcore pornography on television and think there should be at least some laws against hate speech.

Date20:11:27, March 22, 2013 CET
FromLeague of Justice
ToDebating the Liberalization of the media
MessagePeople are perfectly capable of deciding which television content is good for them. A privatized media market will ensure high quality television due to the competition which will exist between the various television companies.
Hardcore porn is okay if it is shown in the late night hours, which would be the case if this bill would pass. We do in spite of everything have another law that forbids nude content to be shown in the day.
The hate speech law can be misinterpreted e.g. it could result in a prosecution if a journalist accused Retsforbundet's leader, Bárður Hentze of being an idiot and this would be of course be silly.

Date20:20:35, March 22, 2013 CET
FromLiberal Konservative Partiet
ToDebating the Liberalization of the media
MessageThe government subsidises independent non profit making cooperatives. Please note, independent. This is very important. We strongly feel that media should be free from government direct control, but we do think that the KBC (Kazulian Broadcasting Corporation) is very valued by our people as a source of quality programming and unbiased newscasting.

Date20:27:16, March 22, 2013 CET
FromLeague of Justice
ToDebating the Liberalization of the media
MessageWe need a completely independent media, we won't accomplish this as long as the state subsidises certain television companies.

Date20:29:49, March 22, 2013 CET
FromLiberal Konservative Partiet
ToDebating the Liberalization of the media
MessageI wholeheartedly disagree. Private companies always have their own agenda, at least the KBC is free to broadcast without motives for profit and political feuds.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 40

no
    

Total Seats: 147

abstain
 

Total Seats: 63


Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws.

Random quote: "Communism, like any other revealed religion, is largely made up of prophecies." - H. L. Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66