We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Green Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Servaes Dynasty (Green-Rel)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3463
Description[?]:
Its time to renew our old and rather nature consuming laws. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Proposed: The government enforces highly restrictive industrial pollution standards.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Proposed: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on whaling.
Old value:: Local governments decide about whaling.
Current: Whaling is illegal.
Proposed: Commercial whaling is illegal, but whaling for scientific purposes is allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:04:21, March 31, 2013 CET | From | Servaes Dynasty (Green-Rel) | To | Debating the Green Act |
Message | Start the debate. |
Date | 21:05:37, March 31, 2013 CET | From | Servaes Dynasty (Green-Rel) | To | Debating the Green Act |
Message | We know that this might anger more decentralized minded people, this is to ensure that all regions are protected and not that companies deplete nature in regions with open nature laws |
Date | 21:07:53, March 31, 2013 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Green Act |
Message | The Karavs strongly disagree with Article 1, most of all. If there are forest agencies, they should be localized. The only problem we have, with the other articles, is that they are not business-friendly. Speranta DeKarav I, Countess-General of Iker Ado |
Date | 21:14:43, March 31, 2013 CET | From | Servaes Dynasty (Green-Rel) | To | Debating the Green Act |
Message | Article one is debatable. The other articles we view as essential to one, protect nature thus make sure we are healthy, and secondly to make sure that companies cannot exploit our fine forests and fill our air whit pollution. It is not business friendly, but these policies can still be followed by companies. We oppose whaling fundamentally as it is first not needed, and secondly that this specie is on the brink of extinction Lord Servaes |
Date | 21:17:22, March 31, 2013 CET | From | Beluz Democratic Karavist Party | To | Debating the Green Act |
Message | There is no evidence to suggest that any species, offshore Beluzia, are on the brink of extinction. Speranta DeKarav I, Countess-General of Iker Ado |
Date | 22:56:54, March 31, 2013 CET | From | Union of Beluz Socialists | To | Debating the Green Act |
Message | I think we should support the existing Local Government policies. Otherwise, we agree on mantaining a prospering nature. Petro Dataks I, High Count of Beluzia. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
no | Total Seats: 99 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
Random quote: "Hatred is not, and should never be considered as another form of freedom of expression." - Icarion Dadhelus, former Selucian politician |